Is Ahmed the answer at RB?

[phin1984!]

Is Salvon Ahmed the Dolphins answer at RB? - Aqua Thirteen

With Myles Gaskin placed on IR prior to the Dolphins week 9 trip to Arizona, little know Salvon Ahmed was given the bulk of the ruling back duties. He

aquathirteen.com

 

[Travis34]

THE answer? No probably not but he might be a solid part of the equation

 

[Kebo]

Long term no

 

[E30M3]

Najee Harris is the answer.

 

[Joe Dolfan]

This week/season? Perhaps. Long term? Perhaps not

 

[fansinceGWilson]

Is Salvon Ahmed the Dolphins answer at RB? - Aqua Thirteen

With Myles Gaskin placed on IR prior to the Dolphins week 9 trip to Arizona, little know Salvon Ahmed was given the bulk of the ruling back duties. He

aquathirteen.com

Complimentary back. Wouldn't be surprised. Feature back? No

 

[artdnj]

Once defences consistently get off the 8 men in box routine our rbs, whoever it is should get some bigger plays.Tua should make this happen eventually.

 

[Mach2]

The answer is dominant line play. Seems pretty simple.

 

[AvogadrosNumber]

Salvon and Gaskins can form a solid committee for us down the stretch with Breida sprinkled in. It might be good enough till reinforcements come next year ... this year we need a bruiser that can break tackles for 4-5 yards a pop which this roster obviously doesn’t have

 

[EverybodysDointhePhish]

Salvon and Gaskins can form a solid committee for us down the stretch with Breida sprinkled in. It might be good enough till reinforcements come next year ... this year we need a bruiser that can break tackles for 4-5 yards a pop which this roster obviously doesn’t have

Did Ajayi’s knees fully give out? He’s still 27...and like you said bruiser who can break tackles is exactly what we need.

 

[Schleprock]

Did Ajayi’s knees fully give out? He’s still 27...and like you said bruiser who can break tackles is exactly what we need.

Ajayi was a flash in the pan, who has bad knees and was extremely inconsistent. Not to mention he has an overrated belief of himself. Hence why he is out of the league.

 

[spiketex]

He's our answer for this week.

 

[DuderinoN703]

We didn’t think Gaskin was the answer (a piece perhaps) so why would Ahmed be?

 

[Feverdream]

I'd have no problem with Gaskin, Ahmed, Laird as our 2,3,4 next year. IF our #1 was a bigger back... Harris, Hubbard... or perhaps Hill.

If we go Etienne or Gainwell... one of those will need to go (or Cox) for a bigger back.

 

[Mach2]

I'd have no problem with Gaskin, Ahmed, Laird as our 2,3,4 next year. IF our #1 was a bigger back... Harris, Hubbard... or perhaps Hill.

If we go Etienne or Gainwell... one of those will need to go (or Cox) for a bigger back.

I would say Cox's days are numbered regardless.

His sole value is lead blocker in short yardage, and we already opt to use linemen in that role.