- Joined
- Sep 23, 2016
- Messages
- 3,296
- Reaction score
- 5,576
Be shocked if Haskins was there at 13, IMO maybe and thats a big maybe Lock there at 13.
Funny and understand your point about sitting a year but usually doesn't influence me when a poster points out one players success while failing to acknowledge the usually huge majority that failed... Think you can find one or two examples of justifying pretty much all opinions.
But would agree with the no OL keeping the guy mostly on the bench. just feel that would be such a big miss calculation though sadly a reasonable approach.
So true, surprised that we haven't added one quality OL yet but blindly hoping that they have their plan and beside #1 QB the #2 insight is the OL to put around him. Understandably, they are still trying to figure that out not knowing the skill set of whoever they end up with at QB.
There are just so many variables to consider that we are aware of and I'm sure they are seeing a lot more than we are..We don't really even know who they like and how much they value these QB's. Are thy interested in 2019 QB draft or 2020 Draft damn......don't think anybody I've read has any kind of factual clue...
you're right. One or even a couple of examples as opposed to the rest of the data is comical. What it does show is that it isn't out of the realm of possibility. If Brady, who also sat a year, wouldn't of become what he did, the entire NFL would've stated as fact that a 6th round pick would never win 6 superbowls. Now, while probably 99% unlikely, it isn't 100% impossible to draft a franchise QB that low.
And, yep. On a team that has so much need the variables are endless.
But... one thing, though. You're absolutely wrong on one on here having a factual clue. Ask Largo (I forget his full name).
Largo! Where you at?!