I couldn't stand Fiedler because it was obvious how limited he was and it was hard to understand wannshcmuks love affair w him. That said, he was tough and gritty and made plays at times to make **** happen. He played above his ability at times. I'm not sure what's worse, a guy w low talent who played bigger, or a guy w immense talent who plays like a total loser in big moments (Tannehill).Fiedler is more like Mark Sanchez. Tannehill is way better. Shouldn't be a debate, just a poor attempt to be little Tannehill