JTC111
Viva la resistance!!!
The CBA can't trump federal law. And as far as I know, there's no EEOC prerequisite before a person can bring suit, although it could possibly have some bearing on the strength of the case.I would think the issue of a "hostile work environment" would be defined somehow in the CBA regarding how that would be handled. And since this is still a workplace incident, it might require to be an EEOC complaint.
...for either side. Anytime you go into court, there's a possibility you can lose badly. It's in the best interest of both the team/league and Martin to settle this as amicably as possible. The league risks having a judge dictate locker room behavior rules and Martin risks any chance at salvaging his NFL career.So I don't think it is a quick leap to a lawsuit.
An ignored complaint would certainly make for a stronger case but a good lawyer will argue that participation by Turner in some of the objectionable actions indicated to Martin that he's receive no help in resolving the problem and that it could worsen the harassment.As an employer, you typically get yourself in trouble when you know about a situation like this and don't take steps to correct or prevent it. In this case, you have the claimant (Martin) admitting he didn't tell anyone.....so this seems to be an uphill battle regarding legal action (my opinion).
The report is what it is. For the team or the league to sue Martin, they'd have to discredit the report that THEY commissioned. Good luck with that strategy.Regarding his issues, I'm not convinced that his lack of success on the field isn't a big part of his behavior. The Wells report seems to take Martin's view of why he left the team on its face value and doesn't explore the fact that his demotion back to the right side and his lack of success on the left side might also be contributing factors to his ultimate implosion. Again, just my opinion, but from what I read, his "feelings" go back to 2012 when the whole leadership council of Bush, Dansby and Long were all there.