Martin vs. Incognito OVER... Martin vs. Philbin NEXT | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Martin vs. Incognito OVER... Martin vs. Philbin NEXT

TheWalrus

1/7/14
Joined
Dec 21, 2011
Messages
22,118
Reaction score
5,108
Age
84
Location
Room 101
I know everybody and their brother has written a Martin/Incognito/Philbin thread, but my role in this has been sort of unique so I thought I would create my own thread.

This whole saga has moved on from it's initial stage and is now hurtling into it's second, in my view. The first was Incognito and Martin. What counts as "bullying"? What's normal for NFL locker rooms? Is there an investigation? Many defended Incognito initially and called on Martin to "man up." Incognito himself brayed like an ass but when it turned out Martin had proof and was willing to use it the fight was over. Incognito was over. Everyone -- or at least pretty much everyone -- recognized that abuse had taken place.

The next phase of this is going to be Philbin vs. Martin... with the question in this case centered around what Philbin knew and when. This press conference today was a recognition of that fact. Philbin was clear and specific about one thing and one thing only... he knew nothing about abuse until Sunday. And as soon as he found out he acted.

To me this stage separates into two separate subgroups of it's own. What did Philbin know? And what should he reasonably be expected to know?

I doubt Martin has texts or voicemails he can bring out to prove his case should he desire to wage this fight (if the Dolphins put him on the NFI they can withold his paycheck, which would be a catalyst in creating a conflict). Perhaps Martin does have tangible proof not just of meetings but of the substance of those meetings. We'll find out. If his "proof" centers around his own mental health issues -- Incognito Sr.'s allegation that Martin threatened to commit suicide on three separate occasions and is a drug addict and that the entire FO and coaching staff knew about it -- he might not want it to be released.

But the second issue -- what Philbin should be reasonably expected to know -- looms almost at large. I'm sure many will content themselves with the idea that Philbin can't be expected to know things unless he is told them. That his ability to learn is entirely passive, in other words. But to me I doubt he'll be able to escape the charge of being either incompetently detached, or of perhaps having inklings that things were going that he refused to investigate further because it might dredge up issues he'd rather were kept buried.

The Dolphins are a professional sports team with armies of lawyers and PR people but I think Martin's side has handled this issue with great skill, releasing new items each day and controlling the narrative. Philbin's press conference was designed to shift the focus back onto Martin, onto Philbin's contention that Martin asserted that there was no abuse until Sunday and he therefore could not have known about it. Should be interesting to see how Martin's team responds tomorrow, as I'm sure they will.
 
I'm of the ilk that if Martin had that meeting with Philbin Sunday night, and didn't say a word about what was going on with Incognito, then there is nothing to blame Philbin for. For those that take the opposite approach and say he should've known, I'd like to know how.

In the chat it was mentioned that Pete Carroll runs Seattle a specific way that deals with having counselors there to help the players. Would this have solved this situation? Do people want Philbin to be a guy like Greg Schiano who people view as being too dictator-like?
 
I'm of the ilk that if Martin had that meeting with Philbin Sunday night, and didn't say a word about what was going on with Incognito, then there is nothing to blame Philbin for. For those that take the opposite approach and say he should've known, I'd like to know how.

ESP. I mean, come on, the dude is bald. And check those beady eyes... if he don't have mental telepathy, get outta here.
 
I'm of the ilk that if Martin had that meeting with Philbin Sunday night, and didn't say a word about what was going on with Incognito, then there is nothing to blame Philbin for. For those that take the opposite approach and say he should've known, I'd like to know how.

In the chat it was mentioned that Pete Carroll runs Seattle a specific way that deals with having counselors there to help the players. Would this have solved this situation? Do people want Philbin to be a guy like Greg Schiano who people view as being too dictator-like?

Well let me put it this way. I'm going to assert -- and I could be wrong -- that some people in the building had either witnessed or knew about some of what was going on. That this treatment -- which has been going on for almost two years -- wasn't a complete mystery to everyone. People might disagree but I think that's a reasonable assertion.

What, if anything, did these people say to Philbin? If they said something, what did he do? If they said nothing... why did they say nothing? Why doesn't Philbin have a policy that any incident of this kind of nature is reported to him and investigated?

As the head coach he sets the tone. He has an overall policy of how these kinds of things are supposed to be handled and everyone feeds off of that. Either he refused to pursue the warning signs, or he was putting the line of acceptable behavior in the wrong place. That's what I'm getting at here.
 
I'm of the ilk that if Martin had that meeting with Philbin Sunday night, and didn't say a word about what was going on with Incognito, then there is nothing to blame Philbin for. For those that take the opposite approach and say he should've known, I'd like to know how.

In the chat it was mentioned that Pete Carroll runs Seattle a specific way that deals with having counselors there to help the players. Would this have solved this situation? Do people want Philbin to be a guy like Greg Schiano who people view as being too dictator-like?

Since I was the one who brought up Seattle I will answer that. I was challenged to give a example of another way and I used the article from ESPN Magazine( I believe) that followed the Seahawks through training camp and the healthy mind, healthy body approach Pete Carroll takes.

As far as Philbin many on here were very happy with the dictator type behavior he displayed on Hardknocks. Specifically the gum wrapper incidents and DT not tying his shoes. There are many ways to be involved as a leader without being a over bearing dictator.

Frankly for this to happen and grow to what it hS it is a failure of leadership from the very top down. It most certainly speaks to the leadership in the locker room being wrong from the team captains to the union rep. The point I was trying to make before the chat locked up is when you are in a position of leadership the person in charge ultimately you are accountable for those beneath you and ignorance isn't generally a excuse.
 
I think if Martin(his lawyer) had proof he came to Philbin with specific allegations, we would have heard it by now.
 
Well let me put it this way. I'm going to assert -- and I could be wrong -- that some people in the building had either witnessed or knew about some of what was going on. That this treatment -- which has been going on for almost two years -- wasn't a complete mystery to everyone. People might disagree but I think that's a reasonable assertion.

What, if anything, did these people say to Philbin? If they said something, what did he do? If they said nothing... why did they say nothing? Why doesn't Philbin have a policy that any incident of this kind of nature is reported to him and investigated?

As the head coach he sets the tone. He has an overall policy of how these kinds of things are supposed to be handled and everyone feeds off of that. Either he refused to pursue the warning signs, or he was putting the line of acceptable behavior in the wrong place. That's what I'm getting at here.

If people saw this stuff going on and THEY didn't tell Philbin, it cannot be his fault. If they told him certain things and he spoke with who he needed to speak with and thought it was resolved (yet wasn't b/c of more provoking after the fact, that isn't Philbin's fault). If Philbin himself knew of this **** going on and didn't do anything about it, he needs to go

Yes he sets the tone. From what we saw on Hard Knocks last year it's that if you act like a tool, you're gone. Think Vontae Davis, think Chad Johnson.
 
If as you say, you "could be wrong" then why make accusations about people YOU KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT?
 
Since I was the one who brought up Seattle I will answer that. I was challenged to give a example of another way and I used the article from ESPN Magazine( I believe) that followed the Seahawks through training camp and the healthy mind, healthy body approach Pete Carroll takes.

As far as Philbin many on here were very happy with the dictator type behavior he displayed on Hardknocks. Specifically the gum wrapper incidents and DT not tying his shoes. There are many ways to be involved as a leader without being a over bearing dictator.

Frankly for this to happen and grow to what it hS it is a failure of leadership from the very top down. It most certainly speaks to the leadership in the locker room being wrong from the team captains to the union rep. The point I was trying to make before the chat locked up is when you are in a position of leadership the person in charge ultimately you are accountable for those beneath you and ignorance isn't generally a excuse.

I'll have to research this Seattle thing before commenting on it. I want to be fair to you and the others who are commenting here.
 
Alot of stuff was done outside the building. paying large amounts of money for vets dinner tabs for everyone. talking thousands of dollars. I am betting he knew nothing of that or overheard some half story from across the room.

The only way I see Philbin knowing something in an official capacity is if he had a personl talk with Martin weeks or months ago. If nothing like that ever happened, good luck proving it! Including Martin.
 
I'll have to research this Seattle thing before commenting on it. I want to be fair to you and the others who are commenting here.

I will try and find the article for you I found it very interesting
 
Back
Top Bottom