Neither (for this reason), but if we squash the TO rumors it's fine by me. So we are talking to Jackson at the Senior Bowl. We will probably talk to most of the players there. Not sure why this is considered "news".SabanEra84 said:is it time we squashed the TO rumors or is this a potential replacement for Booker?
Dolfan4life! said:Neither (for this reason), but if we squash the TO rumors it's fine by me. So we are talking to Jackson at the Senior Bowl. We will probably talk to most of the players there. Not sure why this is considered "news".
SuperDuperFan said:does anyone have more info on chad jackson? I dont follow much college football and would like to know more about him.
also to comment on the booker thing....I think for some reason fans seem to underappreciate him and always see him as expendible. However, I think he's a great compliment to chambers. If we got a solid young #3 guy we would be set a WR for years to come.
Dolfan4life! said:Neither (for this reason), but if we squash the TO rumors it's fine by me. So we are talking to Jackson at the Senior Bowl. We will probably talk to most of the players there. Not sure why this is considered "news".
FinzCrazy said:Considering CJ was a Junior this season, I don't think we are talking to him at the Senior Bowl.
hdjetta6316 said:Who cares if we replace booker, if we draft Jackson or who ever its not like they will start.....
DBoston80 said:Man o' man!!!! Guys regardless if we draft him or not..its not gonna change our approach on much.....Saban isnt sitting around thinking " If I draft Jackson, I can let Booker go. Or stop looking for a CHEAP alternative" Rookie Wr's rarely come in and start so while it would be nice..its not rational.
SpeedRush99 said::confused: Why not? If they're good enough they'll start. Where were you this past season when we started 3 rookies?
SpeedRush99 said:Not true at all.
DBoston80 said:Rookie WR'S rarely start.