MikeO said:Who between now and tomorrow was going to give us fair value? KC was the only team interested.
KB21 said:It doesn't matter. We should get more for Pat than Oakland got for the underachieving Philip Buchanan.
I Suppose you guys are right, I think that Sabin should have gotten something of a replacement first though, other than Poole.
Puffboy(ricky) said:This was a wanny mistake, if he would have traded Madison and not signed him to that deal, we could have gottin rid of him and used money for surtain.
KB21 said:It doesn't matter. We should get more for Pat than Oakland got for the underachieving Philip Buchanan. We didn't. Only in La La Land is Philip Buchanan more valuable than Patrick Surtain.
I agree with you. We did not get value for Patrick, unfortunately. It seems that Saban's desire to get another pick superceeded his desire to get proper value for the league's best cornerback.
Rick 1966 said:No, because Pat is 29 years old and has a chronic knee problem. You're being childishly unrealistic.
Puffboy(ricky) said:This was a wanny mistake, if he would have traded Madison and not signed him to that deal, we could have gottin rid of him and used money for surtain. Madison is untradable because of the cap hit. Wanny should have reversed this when he had the chance. Freaking butthead
KB21 said:So, to you it doesn't matter that Patrick is ten times player Philip Buchanan will ever be?
A terrible precedent has been set. The Miami Dolphins are willing to give away players at the positions of value for virtually nothing. They did it with Adewale Ogunleye last year, and they have done it again with Patrick Surtain.
Next thing you will tell me is that Jason Taylor isn't worth a 1st round pick.
KB21 said:So, to you it doesn't matter that Patrick is ten times player Philip Buchanan will ever be?
MikeO said:But for some reason Houston wanted Phillip. And they were willing to overpay for him.
Teams weren't knocking down our door for Surtain. Sorry, its a fact. KC was the only one