You know what I find kind of funny is how guys get a reputation for playing for the money and taking plays off...during or after failed negotiations with their team.
Seriously if you would have talked to people about Corey Simon a year ago, people would not stop raving about him. HIS COACHES would not stop raving about him. Now, he becomes an unrestricted free agent, gets the franchise tag slapped on him, and he wouldn't bow to his team's demands, and all the sudden there's this notion floating around out there that Corey Simon is an attitude problem guy who takes plays off, doesn't work hard, and plays just for the money.
Simon and his agent have both gone on record denying that the offer they rejected from the Eagles was the offer that everyone says it was. I think the rumor out there is that he rejected a 5 year, $34 million contract with a $10 million signing bonus from the Eagles. If that is true, why do Simon and his agent deny that those were the terms they rejected? They have no incentive to deny it. If they wanted more money than that, they want teams to know that deal was not good enough.
I know this. On more than one occasion Head Coach Andy Reid has labeled Corey Simon the most underrated player in the league. Andy Reid's exact words were something like "On almost every play, he operates on the other side of the line of scrimmage because he easily blows past offensive linemen."
This is a money issue, very similar to Patrick Surtain. They know he's good, they just can't afford to pay him and drafted Mike Patterson to replace him. We would have done the exact same thing with Corey Webster, except Corey got snatched by the Giants before we could get hold of him.
And as for the money that Simon and his agent demanded from other teams when he was on the trading block, he says that they intentionally made those demands high because he simply didn't want to be traded.