Ryan Tannehill oftentimes will have to just trust that Gesicki will come down with contested passes. Building that type of trust is going to be key. As mentioned before, he plays above the rim and can more likely out jump everyone on the field.
Let’s compare Gesicki to Tampa Bay Buccaneers wide receiver Mike Evans.
Gesicki is 16 pounds heavier than Evans, and Evans barely beats Gesicki in the 40-yard dash with a 4.53-second run to Gesicki’s 4.54-second run. However, Gesicki puts up a 41-1/2” vertical jump to Evans’ 37” vertical. Also, Gesicki beats Evans in the 3-cone (6.76 seconds to Evans’ 7.08 seconds), in the 20-yard shuttle (4.10 seconds to Evans’ 4.26 seconds), and in the 60-yard shuttle (11.33 seconds to Evans’ 11.58 seconds). Gesicki tests as a much better athlete than Evans.
Great point. I would also argue that his bulk not only provides power, but makes it significantly easier to shield the reception from DB's who physically have difficulty getting around him to even challenge the catch. It would be similar in basketball to having Kobe Bryant box you out compared to having Shaq box you out. Kobe is one heck of a player, but it's simply harder to get around Shaq to even challenge the pass.Indeed...I just found the comparison to Mike Evans interesting...as he is top paid receiver, and many seem obsessed with knocking Gesicki as not being a tradional tight end who blocks well....while I see him as a big, athletic, red zone and seam nightmare matchup for opponents that we badly need.
Your post does bring up an interesting concept. What if we had a 4 WR formation with him out wide? That sounds like a CB/Safety nightmare with the right route tree.
I'm telling you, we have another Jimmy Graham on our hands. Isn't that what the Saints did with him when he was in New Orleans? I remember he played most of his snaps out wide.
Me and my best friend had a Nintendo day Saturday, working on his truck, drinking beer, playing rampage, talking football. we were talking draft, him a panthers fan, and was asking me about ours, Gesicki is the first one I mentioned, how he was supposed to be jimmy grahamish, but everyone was comlaining about his blocking, even though I think 90% of the time I don't think he was even in a 3 point stance (I don't know numbers, just know everything I ever saw with him was he was a WR), and that todays TE were really just bulkier WR that they want to call TE's so they can save money.
Going back to what you said Chuck, this was a huge deal with Graham playing most of his snaps out wide. he brought the % of the snaps he lined up out wide to league offices or what not because he felt his franchise tag should be that of a WR rather than a TE. I don't remember whatever came about that, but even though I guess he claimed to be a TE, whenever it was time for the money to come around he had no problems whatsoever saying that he was used as WR more than a TE and that's how he valued himself. but rightfully so
Fantastic point theOutback!https://overthecap.com/position/tight-end/
Hmmm, it will be interesting to see if Gesicki becomes a top tier TE. Just looking aside of what it brings to an teams offense, the value is incredible. Would you take Mike evens at 16 mil a year or any of the top TE's at around 9-10 mil? Graham, Kelce, Gronk........... I'd take the TE!
I remember that. If I recall correctly, they eventually met him in the middle on a contract but then traded him like the next offseason.