- Joined
- Nov 22, 2008
- Messages
- 9,631
- Reaction score
- 3,014
Because Matt Flynn isn't a sure thing either. It would be just as dumb to throw big money at a player with a ridiculously small sample size. If Flynn plays like *** then Moore is there to back him up with Tannehill waiting in the wings. And Tannehill is light years better than Pat White.
Can't believe you would actually say that. I guess WVU win loss record under White doesn't apply? Where as Tannehill with 1, 1 full year starting...makes him light years ahead of Pat White. I'm not a Pat White guy, but I will say your statement is baseless at best, silly at worst.