NE won all those SB with RB by committee. Some argue they had Brady, and keep saying a dominating run first offense is the only formular for a SB winning team.
Sorry, you are WRONG.
There is more than one way to skin a cat.
These are the past SB winner without Brady at QB.
KC
Philly
Den
Sea
Bal
All relied on dominating defense and complemented it with balance attack. ( except KC, it is all air ). An vision of the offense Flo is building.
None of it rely on dominating ground game as their #1 factor as their SB winning formular. Even Bal, their #1 RB in SB only had 59 yds on the ground.
You stuck in a narrow vision of what you think its the only way to run an offense, and failed to enter into 21 century.
Sorry, you are WRONG.
There is more than one way to skin a cat.
These are the past SB winner without Brady at QB.
KC
Philly
Den
Sea
Bal
All relied on dominating defense and complemented it with balance attack. ( except KC, it is all air ). An vision of the offense Flo is building.
None of it rely on dominating ground game as their #1 factor as their SB winning formular. Even Bal, their #1 RB in SB only had 59 yds on the ground.
You stuck in a narrow vision of what you think its the only way to run an offense, and failed to enter into 21 century.
Last edited: