Surferosa
Run to Daylight
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2002
- Messages
- 5,787
- Reaction score
- 91
- Age
- 49
Im just joking around with you SWS. I know you are just sharing your thoughts about the guys play. People are just very sensitive about Fiedler since hes been the target of so much criticism. There is defeinitely room to criticize the guy, dont get me wrong. But I think what people dont like are generalizations, since they are often subjective and ambiguous by nature.
By stating that hes underthrows his deep passes, you are stating an objective fact that stands on his own. It can be seen in the replay for all those that witnessed the game. The only thing that can be argued here is the relevance of such a point ("big deal it was a completed pass" others can rebut)
But by categorizing him as "journeyman", you are stepping into the realm of the subjective. Its all semantics here, no evidence can prove otherwise. Thats what pisses people off, because all the evidence we bring to the table (see the winning record, the statistics from my last post) cant rebut your claim - because its not based on any kind of proof.
By stating that hes underthrows his deep passes, you are stating an objective fact that stands on his own. It can be seen in the replay for all those that witnessed the game. The only thing that can be argued here is the relevance of such a point ("big deal it was a completed pass" others can rebut)
But by categorizing him as "journeyman", you are stepping into the realm of the subjective. Its all semantics here, no evidence can prove otherwise. Thats what pisses people off, because all the evidence we bring to the table (see the winning record, the statistics from my last post) cant rebut your claim - because its not based on any kind of proof.