*** OFFICIAL INDIANAPOLIS COLTS @ MIAMI DOLPHINS GAME THREAD *** Week 16 | Page 73 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

*** OFFICIAL INDIANAPOLIS COLTS @ MIAMI DOLPHINS GAME THREAD *** Week 16

napsndreds said:
Not very hard to find a more talented, competitive, mobile qb. If we go in the 1st I'd go with lynch. If not whoever is available maybe cook, cardale jones, wentz...there's s handful this draft that I think are better qbs than Tannehill.
Click to expand...
Cardele Jones? No.
 
WaxOn WaxOff said:
I am 53 and I have been a Dolphins fan probably longer than anyone on this board. I had my first Dolphins Jersey BEFORE Don Shula was made coach. I'll admit the OL sucks. Brady would deal with it and get the ball away quickly.
Click to expand...
Great, problem solved. Let's cut Tannehill and sign Brady.
 
napsndreds said:
Don't really care what any of the tanne supports say. Ryan is hot garbage. I'm gonna judge every position separately. The on line sucks. Tannehill. Sucks even more.
Click to expand...

I wish I had more faces to palm. Nothing sucks worse on this team than the o-line -- not even our linebackers.
 
Regulus said:
What is so outlandish about his post? You don't think several of the qbs in this draft can do better than what RT has accomplished? A career losing record and no playoff appearances. Yeah I'll take my chances. Draft a qb
Click to expand...

Again, RT has not been perfect - and often, he has not been very good. However, his teammates have been absolutely terrible. You subscribe to the ESPN narrative of it all begins and ends with the QB. Understandable, because this is a very simple way to view the game. The NFL wants to market to you, the simple fan with a very limited understanding. They want you to feel as if you understand the game and the easiest way to do that is to market the games as Tannehill VS Brady!! If it began and ended with the QB the Saints, Chargers, and Giants would be in the playoffs, the Vikings and Jets would not. Football is a team game. Good QB's can overcome deficiencies, sure. But Good QB's cannot overcome poor coaching, Schematics, game planning, play calling, and teammate execution - let alone defense responsibilities.

I don't think I need to address your question of the outlandishness of his post, I did that in my immediate response. I'm no Scout, but this isn't 1983 and Cardelle Jones is no Dan Marino.
 
4th And Drunk said:
Again, RT has not been perfect - and often, he has not been very good. However, his teammates have been absolutely terrible. You subscribe to the ESPN narrative of it all begins and ends with the QB. Understandable, because this is a very simple way to view the game. The NFL wants to market to you, the simple fan with a very limited understanding. They want you to feel as if you understand the game and the easiest way to do that is to market the games as Tannehill VS Brady!! If it began and ended with the QB the Saints, Chargers, and Giants would be in the playoffs, the Vikings and Jets would not. Football is a team game. Good QB's can overcome deficiencies, sure. But Good QB's cannot overcome poor coaching, Schematics, game planning, play calling, and teammate execution - let alone defense responsibilities.

I don't think I need to address your question of the outlandishness of his post, I did that in my immediate response. I'm no Scout, but this isn't 1983 and Cardelle Jones is no Dan Marino.
Click to expand...

lol. Great post. I'm a simple fan because I don't think a guy who was playing wr in college and has a losing record as an NFL starter is someone to stand behind. Guy is not clutch. Wasn't in college and has not been in the pros. The rest of the team is garbage along with the qb. You are just too simple to see that.
 
Regulus said:
lol. Great post. I'm a simple fan because I don't think a guy who was playing wr in college and has a losing record as an NFL starter is someone to stand behind. Guy is not clutch. Wasn't in college and has not been in the pros. The rest of the team is garbage along with the qb. You are just too simple to see that.
Click to expand...

I see you ignored my entire post and instead enacted the "I'm rubber and your glue" defense. Good call.
 
4th And Drunk said:
Again, RT has not been perfect - and often, he has not been very good. However, his teammates have been absolutely terrible. You subscribe to the ESPN narrative of it all begins and ends with the QB. Understandable, because this is a very simple way to view the game. The NFL wants to market to you, the simple fan with a very limited understanding. They want you to feel as if you understand the game and the easiest way to do that is to market the games as Tannehill VS Brady!! If it began and ended with the QB the Saints, Chargers, and Giants would be in the playoffs, the Vikings and Jets would not. Football is a team game. Good QB's can overcome deficiencies, sure. But Good QB's cannot overcome poor coaching, Schematics, game planning, play calling, and teammate execution - let alone defense responsibilities.

I don't think I need to address your question of the outlandishness of his post, I did that in my immediate response. I'm no Scout, but this isn't 1983 and Cardelle Jones is no Dan Marino.
Click to expand...

Ya so everyone sucks we know.
I have a simple question. Do some qb have a higher propensity to make game changing plays in the more
Critical moments?
Is so, what effect does this have on team wins, and how does Ryan tannehill do with this??
 
Dolphins512 said:
That's it? An article about Matt Leinert hating Ken Whisenhunt???

you do know the history between those two.....don't you?
Click to expand...

I know that Whisenhunt as a coach never had any success with anyone but Kurt Warner. It looks like he was a bad coach and Warner overcame that, like was said couldn't happen. History or not Leinart is right.
 
Sirspud said:
I know that Whisenhunt as a coach never had any success with anyone but Kurt Warner. It looks like he was a bad coach and Warner overcame that, like was said couldn't happen. History or not Leinart is right.
Click to expand...
Lol.....your reaching deep tonight.
 
dolpns13 said:
Reality is more like we lose 52-9. I'm hoping to see another historically comedic play similar to the jones fumble. That was the best
Click to expand...

That OL during the last play counts. Wonder what will happen in NE? Sack, RT fumbles, ball goes into our endzone, OL picks it up and takes it out, fumbles again, NE recovers and returns it for a TD?
 
Sirspud said:
Seeing what I'm seeing, my prediction is we'll get in this game and it'll be 20 something to 20 something, Tannehill will play well right until the point where he has the capability to take the lead in the 4th quarter, and he'll epicly fail in his decision making and throws at that point.
Click to expand...

Posted this early in the game. Was off on the score. Not off on what Tannehill would do. This is the way he plays. It's what he is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom