Jim Jensen
Practice Squad
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 56
- Reaction score
- 0
- Age
- 52
you didnt address the offensive offensive line
Originally posted by Agua
To win NOW, yeah. Pick up best available OL / WR in 1 & 3. See what's out there in QB and turn it into a competition with Jay. That's the most efficient approach for WIN NOW.
Originally posted by Graythreat
We've been in the "win now" approach for years now, and it's got us nowhere. I believe this team is one offensive spark away from the super bowl, but we had a "window of oppertunity" when Dan was here. And then we had a "window of oppertunity" with this defense about 2 years back, and now we have another "window of oppertunity".
Tell me, when do we start looking to the future a little bit? The FA is used to sign NOW players. Not many rookies come off the bench starting. The draft is used for players of the future. We haven't selected a QB above the 4th round since Marino left. We NEED a QB. The FO should have looked ahead and drafted a QB high BEFORE Marino retired. But they didn't, and we're SOL.
Go for the win now, but to pass up a chance at a potential franchise QB is a gaudy move. Try to win now by signing vet. players (brunelle), use the FA to patch up the O-line, and TRY to get a second string WR.
But in the draft, we NEED to sign a QB with our top pick. I want Eli, but could live with Rivers (NOT Lossman!). Then use the other picks to take a WR and fill the OL. We should be able to find a deal at WR in the low rounds, so FA should be used to sign a vet. QB, and patch up the OL if possible. But we need to start grooming at QB NOW. Our defense will fall apart in about 2 years, they'll be too expensive to keep, and are getting old. THe future of this team is our young offense, we need to start drafting for it after years of neglect.
Originally posted by Agua
Well, what can I say? That's the dilemna. Future or now. Wayne said now. Maybe Dan gets his ear and says "blow it all on a QB". We'll see.
Originally posted by Agua
We'll see.
Not being a nay-sayer, but I can envision conflict, easily, between a hell-bent-for-offense Dan, a Wanny resenting interference in his conservative "let the D win it", and RIck caught in the middle.
I'm certain, well, at least hopeful, they will understand they have to get on the same damned page as far as short and long term goals.
Now, watch this theme end up in a Miami paper. Thieves. LOLOL.