Dirtywater said:Yet another classic. Tuck rule was called correctly. Regardless of jealous fans who only see through homer-colored glasses.
As for being dominant, I could care less. My family & friends got to experience one hell of a ride and I wouldn't trade it for anything. Losers make excuses, and that is what you're doing. You're better than that, but alas...
It has become oh-so-fashionable-and-trendy to bash the Patriots. Ho-Hum.
I guess the Raiders didn't have more than one 4th down to stop us. I guess that's why we beat an awesome Pitt team in Pitt. I guess that's why we kicked the Greatest Show On Turf in the teeth in footballk's biggest game.
You see, the Fins I remember were all business. Didn't need to put others down with words and whining cause they were too busy winning on the field themselves. That's where my respect for them comes from. This current crop with their crybaby fans has really been interesting to watch.
Anyway, talking trash is notmy thing. It's just the kids who cry "Tuck Rule" without knowing that it was called correctly that make me laugh. Not only that, but the Raiders had more chances to stop us than the Fins have traded draft picks for useless RBs.
First, my point being that I think us splitting the season isn't far fetched. 2ndly...I'm not whining. I have my opinion which I'm entitled to. I'm not making excuses. I call it like I see it. Just like the Pats applying what would be multiple penalties against the Colts receivers in a playoff game where refs don't call it cuz they're the Pats.....well...that's what happened. The NFL admitted it after review. So yes....in some ways everything went right for the Pats that one season. It's not me whining and complaining cuz I could care less really. That's just the way I saw that season....an angel on the Pats shoulders.
btw...it's not a fashion for me or trendy to now bash the pats....i've always disliked the AFCE teams....primarily cuz 2 are from New York and I haven't run into too many New Yorkers I like. But those are just my own experiences. If anything....it's been trendy to let the "winners" get away with more stuff as has been evidenced in the NBA as well (someone wrote a great article on this a few months ago and researched who was fouled more etc.)
Anyways, don't make me out to be some whiny 18 year old....cuz I'm not. If you don't like my opinion...oh well. I give credit where I see credit due. The "tuck rule" year.....give or take who cares....in or out...if that one play decided that year then that's wrong anyways....but u have to admit it sure caused one hell of a ruckus.