Agua
Fighting the media, one lie at a time
About the only way this article could have been any more poorly informed would be if they identified Landry as the center.
Tannehill will take more sacks because he doesn't see the rush coming.
Tannehill will take more sacks because he doesn't see the rush coming.
Another point on Cutler. He did a nice job of feeling the pressure and stepping up. In that regard, he's further along than Tannehill, who I think made strides in that area at the end of 2016. You could see him moving more in the pocket anyway.
Tannehill will take more sacks because he doesn't see the rush coming.
How many times was Moore sacked last year? Once every 10 drops! Lol.. in 2016 Cutler was sacked once every EIGHT drop backs. I love how people only mention the stats that they feel prove their agenda. Hahahah.Obviously the author has no clue to how inept Tannehill is in the pocket.
In 2015 Tannehill sacked 45 times on 586 attempts.
In 2016 Tannehill sacked 29 times on 389 attempts and Moore sacked 1 time on 87 attempts.
In 2017 Cutler sacked 20 times on 429 attempts.
3 things guaranteed in life, 1) death 2) taxes 3) Tannefans will be blaming the OL again when Tannehill takes more unnecessary sacks this year as that number significantly rises again assuming he stays healthy.
How many times was Moore sacked last year? Once every 10 drops! Lol.. in 2016 Cutler was sacked once every EIGHT drop backs. I love how people only mention the stats that they feel prove their agenda. Hahahah.
Btw, you try to discredit Tannehill for taking sacks, how many INTs would he have thrown had he not taken those sacks? A sack is better than an INT.
How many times was Moore sacked last year? Once every 10 drops! Lol.. in 2016 Cutler was sacked once every EIGHT drop backs. I love how people only mention the stats that they feel prove their agenda. Hahahah.
Btw, you try to discredit Tannehill for taking sacks, how many INTs would he have thrown had he not taken those sacks? A sack is better than an INT.