Not to speak ill of our beloved Marino but he needed a running game to win a super bowl. And thus he never Won one
Ryan Tannehill 2013: QB Pressure, Completion %, Deep Passing, & YPA Statistics
- Thread starter Shouright
- Start date
dabeastdabone
Seasoned Veteran
No matter how much you hate, Tannehill is still our QB and will be our QB for the next couple of years regardless.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
But the hypothesis is bogus. Even talking about a league wide correlation between passer rating and rushing yards is stupid. You are looking for correlations that shouldn't exist.
2413fanphins
Active Roster
Im not making excuses.
I'm saying they could moonwalk through the season and win that division.
I'm also saying that if tannehill played as bad as luck tonight, you'd be chiming in on every thread, to draft a new qb next year.
Ilovemyfins4eva
Active Roster
luck made plays tonight that we never see from tannehill throughout the season.
luck was far from perfect, but just keep in mind, this is a 2nd year qb, and yes i know tannehill is also, but luck has already played in 3 playoff games, 11-5 both seasons, and is only getting better.
tannehill so far, 2 seasons, we r averaging 7.5 wins, no playoff appearances, and honestly, he is a major question mark right now. if u want to say that the ppl calling him a bust officially already are taking it to far, fine, but to also think he is a lock to turn out as a franchise qb, one who will be able to lead a team on his shoulders for the next 10 plus years is also taking it to far.
tannehill has a lot to improve on.
Well tell that to "nick1" up there who postulated the thing to begin with. I merely gathered the data to test his hypothesis. And in my opinion the null hypothesis shouldn't be rejected.
Now, if you have some sort of more elaborate statistical analysis that you believe gets at his hypothesis and allows us to reject the null hypothesis (that there is no relationship between the variables), then by all means, provide it.
As he should be. He is the best quarterback we have had since Marino and has shown that he can compete and beat some of the NFL's best teams.
next year when we win 5-8 games i cant wait to read all the excuses for tannehill. new gm, new offense, even number year, wallace is too fast....the guy has been mediocre every year hes been a starting qb, 2 at a&m and 2 with the dolphins. forget the stats, he doesnt have the accuracy, awareness or leadership to ever be a franchise qb. just rewatch the last 2 games of the season finsfaninbuffalo, stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Bull****.
So is Tannehill
Team stat.
So does Luck
Hilarious that a "Dolphins Fan" gives all the benefits of the doubts to another team's QB but not his own....Haters gonna hate.
There is a correlation between the 2 but it is hard to measure with stats. As he has said all things are not equal. I was dOing my best to show a correlation with stats. It is very telling that the top rushing team has the most efficient QB
Ah, no he didn't..... Show me where he made any statement about QB ranking and rushing for ALL THE TEAMS IN THE LEAGUE. Jesus......
---------- Post added at 11:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:36 PM ----------
Is it like this on every fan site or do the Fins just have the biggest asshole fans? Just wondering.
So then what is the hypothesis he's postulating? That when teams have a good quarterback and a good running game, they're better than teams that have only one of the two?
Well no ****.
Now, if he's postulating that QBs play better when they have a better running game, then a correlation is precisely the test of the hypothesis.
a-hole fans cause we speak the truth? 4 years ive been watching tannehill and 4 years hes been up and down and inconsistent. you can say whatever you want behind your keyboard and act like a tough guy but 4 years of mediocrity bozo...4 years.
Ilovemyfins4eva
Active Roster
what benefit of the doubt should we give to tannehill now?
luck has carried the team into the playoffs his 1st 2 seasons. yes ur right football is a team game, but the qb gets most of the credit when things go good, and when things go bad most of the blame whether its there doing or there fault.
luck also has no run game, no defense, and depleted wr core. yet he makes things work.
what should i do, rip him for going into foxboro and playing well for 3 qtrs before falling apart? ok, i wish we were in position to critique tannehill after losing in the divisional round in foxboro and keeping us in the game until the 4th.
there is no comparison right now between the 2, none. one is far ahead of the other, at least for now.
Keep living in your fantasy world. Don't let me stop you. Use all the hyperbole you need to make your case. It really is more convincing that way.