Seau is in AWESOME shape | Page 4 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Seau is in AWESOME shape

in comparison, I'ds say Zach Thomas had a better year than his best last year or the year before


YEAR TEAM G GS TOT SOLO AST SK SYD STF STYD SF FF BK INT YDS AVG LNG TD PD
1996 MIA 16 16 154 124 30 2.0 13.0 6.0 15.0 0 1 0 3 64 21.0 27 1 5
1997 MIA 15 15 128 97 31 0.5 5.0 4.5 7.5 0 2 0 1 10 10.0 10 0 8
1998 MIA 16 16 136 111 25 2.0 16.0 14.0 31.0 0 2 0 3 21 7.0 17 2 7
1999 MIA 16 16 133 108 25 1.0 10.0 12.5 29.0 0 1 0 1 0 0.0 0 0 9
2000 MIA 11 11 99 71 28 1.5 3.5 6.0 15.0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0 0 0 1
2001 MIA 15 15 155 117 38 3.0 27.0 5.0 12.0 0 2 0 2 51 25.0 34 1 4
2002 MIA 16 16 156 123 33 0.5 5.5 3.5 6.5 0 0 0 1 7 7.0 7 0 4
Total 105 105 962 660 302 10.5 80 0.0 0 0 9 0 12 153 12.0 34 4 38


you could alos argue that London Fletcher had a better year in 2000 when he broke STL's franchise record for tackles while forcing 5 turnovers.

YEAR TEAM G GS TOT SOLO AST SK SYD STF STYD SF FF BK INT YDS AVG LNG TD PD
1998 STL 16 1 12 11 1 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
1999 STL 16 16 90 69 21 3.0 22.0 4.5 5.5 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2000 STL 16 15 133 106 27 5.5 26.5 4.5 20.5 0 1 0 4 33 8.0 12 0 8
2001 STL 16 16 119 93 26 4.5 33.0 5.5 13.5 0 4 0 2 18 9.0 18 0 5
2002 BUF 16 16 149 108 41 3.0 19.0 1.0 1.0 0 2 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
Total 80 64 503 384 119 16.0 100 0.0 0 1 7 0 6 51 8.0 18 0 17
 
Originally posted by MOULDSROCKS
in comparison, I'ds say Zach Thomas had a better year than his best last year or the year before


you could alos argue that London Fletcher had a better year in 2000 when he broke STL's franchise record for tackles while forcing 5 turnovers.
Click to expand...


OMG!!!!! Your absolute longest post ever! Copy and paste is a wonderful thing huh? :rolleyes:


Fletcher is solid but he aint no Zach! That is who your comparing him too right? If so ...... WRONG!!!
 
So I don't get banned, I'll just say, learn how to read english.


Thank you.



But since you bring it up. London = Zach. Only an absoloute moron (or homer) would say they aren't compareable at the least, with London edging him in pass rush and coverage ability.

But at the same time
Zach is on the downfall of his career
London is juts starting to reach his prime

:p
 
Zach is in the downfall of his career? Hrm. . .

Played pretty well last year.
 
Originally posted by MOULDSROCKS
So I don't get banned, I'll just say, learn how to read english.


Thank you.



But since you bring it up. London = Zach. Only an absoloute moron (or homer) would say they aren't compareable at the least, with London edging him in pass rush and coverage ability.

But at the same time
Zach is on the downfall of his career
London is juts starting to reach his prime

:p
Click to expand...


So your 2000 argument is based on him breaking an all time tackles record in StL? Or was it because it was the only year Zach's numbers look dwindled, due to a broken bone...... :rolleyes:

But only a (FILL IN THE BLANK) would say that one player is in STARTING TO REACH HIS PRIME, while one is on the DOWNFALL OF HIS CAREER, when they came into the league TWO YEARS APART!!!!!

I suggest you learn football just a little more, but do keep playin the boards! I find you very humorous.....:rolleyes:
 
STL's all time tackle record is 133? Wtf? That's uhh...rather pitiful. This matters virtually nothing whatsoever.

Dont look at Fletchers tackle numbers and claim that makes them comparable, either. The Bills defense saw 2-3 games worth more rushes then the Dolphins defense did...Meaning Fletcher had a whole hell of alot more of a change to get tackles then Zach did, but still ended up with less.

Fletcher is not a comparable player to Zach. Maybe in the mind of Buffalo fans, but what does that count for besides a good hearty chuckle among people who have a clue what's going on?

Moulds, you'd probabaly be better off spamming things in the smack forum.
 
Originally posted by MOULDSROCKS
I was comparing Seau's best year ever to Thomas and Fletcher.....


:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


May I suggest being more clear?


:lol:
 
Originally posted by Disgustipate
STL's all time tackle record is 133? Wtf? That's uhh...rather pitiful. This matters virtually nothing whatsoever.

Dont look at Fletchers tackle numbers and claim that makes them comparable, either. The Bills defense saw 2-3 games worth more rushes then the Dolphins defense did...Meaning Fletcher had a whole hell of alot more of a change to get tackles then Zach did, but still ended up with less.

Fletcher is not a comparable player to Zach. Maybe in the mind of Buffalo fans, but what does that count for besides a good hearty chuckle among people who have a clue what's going on?

Moulds, you'd probabaly be better off spamming things in the smack forum.
Click to expand...



the record according the them is 201 tackles.... they are not an official stat.

my stat book says Zach had like 196 tackles, the baove says 155....



wow....

ok, let's switch it up then.
when he was in st. louis he faced less rushes than anyone in the league, but still had 201 tackles.

:goof: :lol:
 
no doubt that he'll bring heart to the team and the defence needs it bad, specially on the road.

Ozzy rules!!
 
I don't need him to have his best year ever. I just want him to be better then the people who came before him. I think he will make the LBs better. He personally will be better then Rodgers. I have no doubt.
 
Originally posted by MOULDSROCKS
So I don't get banned, I'll just say, learn how to read english.


Thank you.



But since you bring it up. London = Zach. Only an absoloute moron (or homer) would say they aren't compareable at the least, with London edging him in pass rush and coverage ability.

But at the same time
Zach is on the downfall of his career
London is juts starting to reach his prime

:p
Click to expand...
WOW that was a very dumb statment, zach is actuely an excellent coverage LB. Ask Any coach in the league they would trade fletcher for zack because flethcer will never be as good as zack
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom