Harbaugh has talent but he sounds like a total prick. The GM is eager to replace him even after 3 excellent seasons. The players allegedly don't like him but he gets results. Buyer beware.
Harbaugh has talent but he sounds like a total prick. The GM is eager to replace him even after 3 excellent seasons. The players allegedly don't like him but he gets results. Buyer beware.
1. Unless sub-par and average are interchangeable words for you both Sanchez and Tannehill should be described the same way.
2. 11-5 with sub-par QB play is impressive. Beating the Painter led Colts team to back in at 8-8 is not that impressive. Getting to back to back championship games is impressive but Sanchez played good in the playoffs which speaks to what I said earlier, give Rex Ryan a Russell Wilson and he would be a championship caliber head coach.
3. I believe the same of Philbin. As impressive as the one 11-5 season was for Rex he hasn't come close to replicating it with similar QB play, and it doesn't look like he's close to ever doing it again. We were one play or one good QB performance away from winning several games more games last year, we could have easily been 11-5 or 12-4 with a little luck, or amazing plays by our QB at the end of a few games. When you have a sub-par QB you have no choice but to deal with this type of extreme variance. And as I pointed out, Sanchez's playoff passer rating and record indicates he's a gamer, he has the ability to step up his game as the pressure gets ratcheted up. Is Tannehill a gamer or is he more of an Andy Dalton?
Do you honestly think that the Patriots are the only team that if they sign a guy asks about the team they played for.
Sanchez was a turnover MACHINE. While Tannehill hasn't lit the world on fire, he also hasn't been near as turnover prone as Sanchez. Turnovers Are much more difficult for a coach and team to overcome. That hasn't been the case with Tannehill
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And they still made it to the championship games with more turnovers.... Put Tannehill on that team and they do the sameSanchez had 46 turnovers in his first 2 seasons. Tannehill had 41.
No I do not. But there is a big difference between signing a player to help your team as a football player first that happens to have knowledge of your opponent and signing a player merely to get knowledge on your opponent. I think Belichick is one of the few or maybe the only one that does the latter, definitely the only one that is so obvious about it anyway.
No doubt, but that's what I'm saying, Rex was able to go to back to back championship games with subpar QB play. Philbin couldn't even make the playoffs with average QB play and a comparable defense to Jets'.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
People give way too much credit and blame to the qb. No qb no matter how good wins games by themselves. Now if your qb is horrible it makes it harder of course but any decent qb can win a superbowl with a good team around them. Not one qb in the history of the NFL has won a superbowl all by himself.This is such a straw man argument. You act like the qb is the only thing a team needs to succeed.
Obviously Trent dilfer and brad johnson showed that you dont need elite qb play to be successful
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
And they still made it to the championship games with more turnovers.... Put Tannehill on that team and they do the same
Philbin couldn't even make the playoffs
Going 11-5 with sub-par QB play is an impressive feat. RGIII being the youngest player to post 100+ passer rating and getting a playoff win his first season is also impressive. Nick Foles leading the NFL in passer rating and tying the TD record in a game is impressive. Those are signs that those players could be great. But you can't make the leap that because Tannehill hasn't done those things that he will end up bad, or can't be better than them in the future. 100+ passer rating is a predictive stat for the guy that posts it, it says nothing of his competitor that posts an 80 rating. An 80 passer rating is not predictive of anything, regardless of what his peers are doing.
So Rex Ryan winning 11 games any given season with sub-par QB play is impressive, but that doesn't mean coaches that don't win 11 games with sub-par QB play are necessarily worse. And if Ryan did it regularly or even more than once it would be much more impressive, but a one time event could easily be attributed to plain old luck. And what the hell happened to Sanchez anyway? It seems to me his play fell off a cliff under Ryan's watch.
apparently BB doesnt need Cincy's hand signals....its andy dalton for cryin out loud.
We should trade them Philbin head up for him...