TarHeelFinFan
Goodness Gracious Great Balls of Fire
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
- Messages
- 5,212
- Reaction score
- 2,804
- Age
- 40
- Location
- Chapel Hill, NC/ Sunrise, FL
I’d take 3 decades of 8-8 over ever going 0-16.It’s better than 7-9 or 8-8 for a decade!
I’d take 3 decades of 8-8 over ever going 0-16.It’s better than 7-9 or 8-8 for a decade!
That was on the unproven and utter failure at GB LB coach Patrick Graham.When the D gives up a 3rd and 20 to Mason Rudolph... Chase Young sounds pretty good to me
One year of 0-16 is worth it.I’d take 3 decades of 8-8 over ever going 0-16.
I’d take 3 decades of 8-8 over ever going 0-16.
That was on the unproven and utter failure at GB LB coach Patrick Graham.
They can only accept the loss a day later.The site is too confusing. I feel like everybody wants the number 1 overall pick more than anything Tuesday through Saturday. Then fall apart during losses. You can’t have it both ways.
Except it’s not. Going 0-16 has never propelled a team to a Super Bowl. Not once. In 3 years we are going look like Cleveland does this year: overhyped from all the picks and money, and still just a loser franchise with a loser culture going nowhere.One year of 0-16 is worth it.
Neither is going 8-8 for years now.Except it’s not. Going 0-16 has never propelled a team to a Super Bowl. Not once.
Oh my God....no.I’d take 3 decades of 8-8 over ever going 0-16.