Slightly above average. Let's call it that.
No.
Sorry, you don’t get to dictate that.
Slightly above average. Let's call it that.
There won't be one.
Slightly above average. Let's call it that.
So a blanket statement then? Not going to actually look at the plays / see the reasons for the sacks taken?Jay Cutler on 430 att took 20 sacks in 2017
Ryan on 390 att took 29 sacks in 2016.
So a blanket statement then? Not going to actually look at the plays / see the reasons for the sacks taken?
Thats a pretty weak argument
He is average when he plays his best, otherwise below average
Tannehill threw for 230 yards a game in 2016 and Cutler threw for 190 yards a game in 2017. If you're gonna use "stats", don't make them up.No. Because following your pursuit we can arrive at conclusions that Cutler would’ve taken us to SB in 2016.
You asked for facts. The facts are Ryan Tannehill took significantly more sacks than Cutler in our offense, with less attempts!
In Ryan’s presumably best year, he was about as effective as Cutler was in 2017, and our total passing yardage was about the same, 220 yds per game.
Ryan Tannehill in his hayday was average, and in some areas poor.
The significance of the last season with Cutler was factual confirmation that Tannehill is slightly better than Cutler, an 8-8 qb, if you did not know it before last season.
That’s facts. I said our, meaning the team, for the two years was abt the same at 220.Tannehill threw for 230 yards a game in 2016 and Cutler threw for 190 yards a game in 2017. If you're gonna use "stats", don't make them up.
Go back and watch the plays breakdown and come back to this discussion. This is just laughableNo. You want to introduce biases to twist arguments. Stats are not biased, they are clear facts.
And in this case consistent with previous years when he took way too many sacks. Facts are he takes too many sacks.
Your biased approach serves to reach a weak conclusion that all previous teams sucked for not protecting Ryan. That conclusion is divorced from facts.
Cutler was bailing at the top of his drop and throwing off his back foot to avoid contact. That doesn't make for an effective QB. Don't think there's a stat for "afraid of contact"?That’s facts. I said our, meaning the team, for the two years was abt the same at 220.
So ppl will say Ryan Tannehill is better than Cutler, which he is, but they dont want to admit he takes more sacks. They dont want to acknowledge that fact, that he takes too many sacks.