Unfortunately it took me a couple of back and forths to reach the same conclusion.
The Fumble: Tannehill Checked Out of a Run Play
- Thread starter Shouright
- Start date
Unfortunately it took me a couple of back and forths to reach the same conclusion.
enigmatics
Go get me a juice box!
Still waiting on your data to show me Moore's fumbles were predominantly from non-contact.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2011
- Messages
- 30,099
- Reaction score
- 15,369
Please don't feign indignation on my account. After the last time I called you out on posting flat out lies, you tried the same thing. It doesn't work.
enigmatics
Go get me a juice box!
It's the rate of fumbling. Moore played in 13 games .... he fumbled 14 times. That's 1.07/game in 2011.
Tanny has played in 6 games in 2013. He has 7 fumbles. That's 1.16/game.
---------- Post added at 05:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:01 PM ----------
What lies?
I just posted the line ...... Moore played in 13 games in 2011 and averaged 1.07 fumbles/game. Tanny in 2013 is averaged 1.16 fumbles/game.
In fact all you've ever done is comment about me personally.
truedolfan57
Active Roster
so you are completely taking out the fact that tannehill has been sacked 26 times in those 6 games, and moore 36 in 12.5? if you say that doesn't matter, 1, i am wasting my time and 2, you aren't too bright.
After having an emotional outburst about contact and non contact.
enigmatics
Go get me a juice box!
After having an emotional outburst about contact and non contact.
Still waiting on your compelling argument that Moore fumbled mostly from non-contact to reach it's conclusion via FACTS.
well said perfect post
apparently my quote didnt go through, to lazy to go through the entire thread to find what i had highlighted right now...
apparently my quote didnt go through, to lazy to go through the entire thread to find what i had highlighted right now...
Filled with passive aggressive shenanigans.
enigmatics
Go get me a juice box!
If not wearing permanent rose-colored glasses all the time makes me passive aggressive, then so be it. Sorry some of us actually think our players and our team aren't flawless at this point. I forgot, we already won the Super Bowl so criticisms should be shunned and posters be made fun of on a 24/hour basis on here like it's your job.
That statistic doesn't refer to the time they had to throw. That statistic refers to the average time it took them to throw the ball, based on all the times they did throw it.
I was talking about me actually.
hoops
Tua time!
the bottom line is tannehill and matt moore do not fumble the football at anywhere near the same clip...pretty much as i expected...i have no way to verify contact vs non contact but i know moore had a bunch of botched center qb exchanges in 2011...and put the ball on the ground all the time...
i also know that tannehill takes care of the ball better than matt moore...so this really is a waste of time
i also know that tannehill takes care of the ball better than matt moore...so this really is a waste of time
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "misinformation in the original post." What the original post consists of is a portion of an article that was posted to the internet, properly quoted, with a link included, along with some statistical probability information from another site. I knew of no other information elsewhere that contradicted this information when I posted it.
Now, by contrast, you're saying Tannehill was given an option to throw or pass based on the defensive front, and you've included no reference for that information. I'm happy to consider it along with the rest of what we've gathered here if it's coming from some sort of reputable source, however. :)