Exactly. Agreed 100%. And that 20 yard square in is one of my very favorite routes in the NFL. It's really too bad we're picking too late in the first to grab Sammy Watkins. He's such a perfect fit for Kubiak's offense. I realize everyone thinks we have to spend our first four picks on the offensive line but I think there are some good players out there to be had this year in FA.
The Gary Kubiak Offense: concepts and analysis
- Thread starter TheWalrus
- Start date
Exactly. Agreed 100%. And that 20 yard square in is one of my very favorite routes in the NFL. It's really too bad we're picking too late in the first to grab Sammy Watkins. He's such a perfect fit for Kubiak's offense. I realize everyone thinks we have to spend our first four picks on the offensive line but I think there are some good players out there to be had this year in FA.
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
Looks like we're going to get to find out. Hope the ole guy still has something left in the tank.
tl77
Too high to fail
He hasn't even interviewed and 2 OC's already chose other teams. You're pretty confident he would accept if given an offer
Quality post from a quality poster. This is what finheaven is all about.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2011
- Messages
- 30,319
- Reaction score
- 16,143
You'd better hope we're going to find out.
Because if Gary decides he doesn't want the job, we are ****ed.
matt11390
Starter
Benjamin as a WR from FSU and Ebron as a TE from UNC can play that role in their respective positions.
Thank you.
AllFinsAllDay
Active Roster
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 2,318
- Reaction score
- 768
CSONKA1966
Active Roster
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2011
- Messages
- 1,004
- Reaction score
- 1,241
A guy like Boldin
Why wouldn't this stuff be just as antiquated and easy to defend in 2014 as the Packers sweep was by 1970? The book is so out on this.
I feel like we need a trendsetter here, not a follower.
Evolution. We need it.
Also, what's an easier path to near-future success? Jettison many players and have to fill many holes to fit a zone-system, or design something to fit our current talent?
We should be power-bludgeoning defenses with our big offensive linemen, not making elephants tap dance. Double-down on the positive aspects of what our roster presents.
To me, the WCO, itself, is outdated and easy to defend and doesn't challenge defenses enough.
Also, we need offense that maximizes Tannehill's athleticism. His best play of the whole season came on that 4th & 10 vs Baltimore which really should have been a game-winning TD as it hit Gibson perfectly in stride. That's where I would start as an OC; in what situations do players excel?
I want an OC who can come in here and maximize what we currently have and tweak from there. Who can do that?
I feel like we need a trendsetter here, not a follower.
Evolution. We need it.
Also, what's an easier path to near-future success? Jettison many players and have to fill many holes to fit a zone-system, or design something to fit our current talent?
We should be power-bludgeoning defenses with our big offensive linemen, not making elephants tap dance. Double-down on the positive aspects of what our roster presents.
To me, the WCO, itself, is outdated and easy to defend and doesn't challenge defenses enough.
Also, we need offense that maximizes Tannehill's athleticism. His best play of the whole season came on that 4th & 10 vs Baltimore which really should have been a game-winning TD as it hit Gibson perfectly in stride. That's where I would start as an OC; in what situations do players excel?
I want an OC who can come in here and maximize what we currently have and tweak from there. Who can do that?
Compared to what, pray tell?
Walrus, thank you for a well thought out and written article. I have been coming here for a long time and was starting to lose faith in some of the posts. Lots of knee jerk articles...Not sure if we can land Kubiak, but if we do it sure will be fun to watch and see what this offense can accomplish.