fish fan 4 life
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2004
- Messages
- 2,095
- Reaction score
- 2
Dolphins
great post man...painnotpleasure said:I must say that this is a good comparison. I'm going to try to be as impartial as I can while giving my comparison.
Most Recent Seasons:
Chris Chambers
Receptions: 69
Recieving Yards: 898
Recieving Average: 13.0
Touchdowns: 7
20+: 8
40+: 3
First downs: 46
Marty Booker
Receptions: 50
Receiving Yards: 638 yards
Receiving Average: 12.8
Touchdowns: 1
20+: 8
40+: 1
First downs: 30
David Boston (Since he hasn't played a single game for us, I'll go with his most recent season)
Receptions: 70
Receiving Yards: 880
Receiving Average:12.6
Touchdowns: 7
20+: 13
40+: 2
First downs: 42
Roy Williams
Receptions: 54
Receiving Yards: 817
Touchdowns: 8
Receiving Average: 15.1
20+: 15
40+: 2
First Downs: 34
Experience: There's no question here that experience goes to Miami with a distinct advantage.
Chris Chambers (26 years old, 5 years pro experience),
Marty Booker (28 years old, 7 years pro experience),
David Boston (26 years old; 7 years pro experience)
OPPOSED TO:
Charles Rogers (24 years old; 3 years pro experience),
Roy Williams (23 years old, 2 year pro experience),
Mike Williams (21 years old; 0 years pro experience
When it comes to potential it's hard to tell, while the obvious choice for potential seems like Detroit because Rogers hasn't played enough and Mike Williams hasn't played a game yet... you would think that they would be the team with the potential. But if you look at David Boston never playing a game for us, and Marty Booker never having had a FULL training camp and offseason with us (2 former Pro Bowl WR's), there's no telling how much these guys can produce therefore unlimited potential.
If you add Randy McMichael to the mix, there is no doubt in my mind that Miami has the better (and more) recieving threats. But when it comes to better WR's... On paper (which is all we can go by right now), I would gave to give the nod to Detroit.
We also have some advantage believe it or not. While Boston and Rogers are both injury prone, Boston has at least gotten a chance to show what he has to offer and has proven that he is a Pro Bowl WR.
Even though it's irrelevant, Boston's stats his first two years were 111 catches for 1629 yards and 9 TD's (with only starting 24 out of 32 games) as opposed to Rogers 22 Receptions for 243 yards and 3 TD's.
We know for Miami on the Depth Chart it looks like:
WR1- Chris Chambers
WR2- Marty Booker
WR3- David Boston
For Detroit Charles Rogers was #1 for awhile but it's kind of hard to tell... I personally think it's going to be...
WR1- Roy Williams
WR2- Mike Williams
WR3- Charles Rogers
OR...
WR1- Charles Rodgers
WR2- Roy Williams
WR3- Mike Williams
Quick Comparison.
When both HEALTHY I like David Boston over Charles Rogers
Roy Williams over Chris Chambers
and this is a tough one but unless he shows himself to be a bust Mike Williams over Marty Booker. That's a big question mark... so instead of calling this a Detroit by defeat, I'm going to call it a tie until proven otherwise.
I'm out. :goof:
Valbon8 said:I like the Dolphins more than the Lions because they have that speed receiver that the Lions don't really have. Another team that would have nice receiving core would be the Browns, but Winslow had to get in a motorcycle accident. If I'd take any core of receivers though, it would have to be the Colts.
Thanks man. And yes, I agree. :up:finsnchips said:great post man...
I think the Detroit Williams duo could be lethal... but it is all based on potential.
baalworship said:Miami the best WR corps in the NFL?! Your WR's aren't even better than
New England
Buffalo
Jersey
who are in your division.
:roflmao: