Ok ok, I meant the year after. Spurstalk.com deems it the "2010 plan"
Hang on, let me don my Jamie Hyneman beret and bust this myth.
First, your pals at Spurstalk need to check their math. It's a "2011" plan.
Here are the Spurs' committed cap figures for the next few years...
2008-9: $53.8 million
2009-10: $52.7 million
2010-11: $32.2 million
Figure the cap for 2010-11 will be around $62 million or so, and you're thinking, "hey, $30 million in cap room. AWESOME!" Well, here's the thing about that: everyone has tons of cap room for 2010-11. Every single team is at least $15M under my projected cap right now. A few teams have $0 in contracts for 2010-11, and many have less than $10M.
As a matter of fact, only 8 teams have more committed salary for 2010-11 than the Spurs do, and one of those (NJ) is only ahead by a hundred thousand bucks. Even the chuckleheads in Madison Square Garden are looking at about $34 million in cap room that offseason, at present. (Admittedly, that doesn't account for a couple player options that are likely to be exercised, which push that number down to about $16 million, but you get the idea.)
Now, my point is not that the Spurs are doomed. Far from it; I'd much rather spend $32.2 million on Duncan and Parker, as the Spurs have, and build around that than have Richard Jefferson and Vince Carter for the same price, or Michael Redd, Charlie Bell, Dan Gadzuric and Andrew Bogut for $38.7 million, or Zach Randolph and Jamal Crawford for $28.2 million. Rather, it's that you can't seriously have a "2011 Plan", because there are: a. too many things that can change in the meantime, and b. right now, there's way too many dollars chasing the top players in 2011.
It's difficult to seriously consider the impact of large amounts of cap space more than a few months in advance of free agency and all but impossible to seriously consider it more than a year and a half in advance. When you get out to a full 3 years, making any sort of coherent plan for how you want to spend that cap space is pointless.