The Patriots Plan: Who Do They Eliminate? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

The Patriots Plan: Who Do They Eliminate?

The Bopkin

Seasoned Veteran
Club Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2003
Messages
4,379
Reaction score
11,032
Location
Pennsylvania
So, the Bellichek model for his D is to find your most valauble offensive weapon and take it away, and let the "lesser" players beat you.
Who do you think BB sees as that player for us, and what do you think he does to eliminate him?
 
They are going to stop the run and blitz tannehill on passing downs. It's very effective because tannehill plays poorly when facing the blitz
 
Anyways, the Pats D sucks this year. The key to beating us is exploiting the glaring issues our D keeps putting on tape (and making up for with big plays) if they run the ball effectively or get Gronk matched up on McMillan (or any of our linebackers to be honest) .... oh dear

The Pats accurate dink and dunk O is also well placed to exploit coverage issues that were clear v Oakland, but Edelman's suspension will help us against this.

Gordon coming out with a handful of scripted plays designed specifically to exploit what our D is bad at is also a significant concern.



But the Pats D? Yea Tannehill can slice that open, especially if we find some hint of a running game - which is on the OL not the rbs.
 
How genius a plan...who would have thought to do that
 
This is honestly one of the best things about our offense right now. There is no "go to" guy for the offense to click. For example, shut down Gronk and NE has been hurting. Stills maybe the closest thing to that person in the passing game, but many other receivers that we go to. I do think stopping the running game would be first on my list and play a lot of man to man on our receivers.
 
New England doesn’t have the defense to take anything away this year. That unit is terrible and lacks speed and top end talent.
 
It's been stated time and time again since his rookie year that Tannehill eats the blitz alive...



Where Ryan Tannehill was his best, and worst
ByJAMES PARKS Jun 28, 2017
Share
0 Comments

More than once through the years, Ryan Tannehill has been criticized for his play under pressure.

That criticism likely arose as a consequence of the Miami Dolphins’ quarterback being the NFL’s most sacked signal caller since coming into the league (219). But, as Pro Football Focus’ calculations have revealed, there’s more than meets the eye.

According to the analytics and grading service, Tannehill finished last season as the NFL’s fifth-most efficient passer when facing a blitz, achieving a 105.6 mark in that category, against a league average of 91.1 overall.


From 247 Sports:
Here you go.

moderator edit: https://247sports.com/nfl/miami-dol...hill-passing-numbers-blitz-pressure-52994095/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where Ryan Tannehill was his best, and worst
ByJAMES PARKS Jun 28, 2017
Share
0 Comments




More than once through the years, Ryan Tannehill has been criticized for his play under pressure.

That criticism likely arose as a consequence of the Miami Dolphins’ quarterback being the NFL’s most sacked signal caller since coming into the league (219). But, as Pro Football Focus’ calculations have revealed, there’s more than meets the eye.

According to the analytics and grading service, Tannehill finished last season as the NFL’s fifth-most efficient passer when facing a blitz, achieving a 105.6 mark in that category, against a league average of 91.1 overall.

Ahead of Tannehill was Dallas’ Dak Prescott (106.6), New Orleans’ Drew Brees (107), Atlanta’s Matt Ryan (120.4), and New England’s Tom Brady (131.4).

But, despite that mark, Tannehill’s play against overall pressure was still poor. When compared to his otherwise improved performance under normal pocket conditions, Tannehill emerges as one of the NFL’s most puzzling specimens under center.

“Last season, Tannehill posted a passer rating of 49.1 when under pressure, which ranked seventh-worst of all 33 quarterbacks with at least 200 pass attempts,” notes analyst Scott Barrett.

“When operating from a clean pocket, Tannehill’s passer rating of 116.6 ranked fourth-best. This 67.5-point differential between these two numbers was the largest among all quarterbacks last season.”

The only two quarterbacks whose disparities between play under pressure and in clean pockets that were remotely close were a rookie and a career backup: Philadelphia’s Carson Wentz (61.6) and Chicago’s Matt Barkley (61.4).

Moreover, when facing pressure, Tannehill threw the NFL’s second-most interceptions, had the 10th-highest sack percentage, and had the league’s fourth-worst quarterback efficiency rating.

The presence of Mike Pouncey at the center position had an effect on how the Dolphins’ pass game developed, but not that much. Among centers to play 50 snaps, Pouncey was the NFL’s ninth-best in pass blocking, but after going down with his second hip injury, his backups fared reasonably well: zero sacks allowed, two hits, 10 hurries in 648 plays.

A side note: the difference between Pouncey and backup Anthony Steen when it came to run blocking was profound: Jay Ajayi gained over 53 percent of his eventual NFL-fourth-most rushing yardage when running behind Pouncey, while Steen was the league’s worst-graded run blocker in the middle.

Last season, the Dolphins finally started to see some of that long hoped-for potential in their quarterback. Tannehill, under known quarterback guru Adam Gase, achieved career-best marks in completion percentage, touchdown ratio, and passer rating.

But, judging by these numbers, there’s still work to be done.

From 247 Sports:
Here you go.

There is a big difference between pressure and a blitz.

The knock on Tannehill has been his performance when he does not have a clean pocket, not when he is blitzed...

The article you posted says exactly that, he has not been good when he doesn't have a clean pocket.

If you look up all the stats and articles about his performance vs the blitz, you will find he is one of the better QBs in the league vs the blitz
 
Feel free to post as many on-topic anti/pro Tannehill blitz articles as you want - but all must follow the site rules on quote length and provide sources
 
Back
Top Bottom