Top 10 Best Pickups [My Opinion]

[finmann]

Nice job buddy, you put alot of effort into it.

 

[Barbarian]

You say kurts not a top 5 qb but look at his numbers my friend infact let me get them for ya

When hes protected these are his stats

1999St. Louis Rams161649932565.143538.7275411329/2016016109.22000St. Louis Rams111134723567.734299.8885211820/115491498.32001St. Louis Rams161654637568.748308.8565362238/2338111101.4

thats 98 TDs to 53 interceptions with an average rating in the 100s and an averrage of 66% completion ratio. Not to mention he throws a bunch of yards...if you look at how this arizona team is built it reminds me so much of the 99 rams that its not even funny.

I think Kurt Warner #'s will look like this

26 TDs 9 Ints 4,200 yards 63 % completion ratio

I didnt say that surtain was a fa pickup i said offseason pickups...offseason consists of trading my friend.

I didnt make the draft picks out to be all first rounders its just in my opinion how they will impact on the teams

First off, great report, I agree with about 90% of what you posted...

But about Warner...

You say to look at what he has done when protected, but the lines you posted put up insane levels of protection that would make anybody look good, for a more accurate look, lets see what other QB's have done during seasons where they split time with Warner on a more even basis gamewise to see how other QB's do with the same level of protection as Kurt... (Not included is 2004, because quite frankly, comparing him to a Rookie would be just silly)

2002
Warner 144/220, 1431 Yds, 6.5 YPA, 3 TD, 11 INT, 67.4 QB Rating
Martin 124/195, 1216 Yds, 6.2 YPA, 7 TD, 10 INT, 71.7 QB Rating
Bulger 138/214, 1826 Yds, 8.53 YPA, 14 TD, 6 INT, 101.5 QB Rating

2000
Green 145/240, 2063 Yds, 8.6 YPA, 16 TD, 5 INT, 101.8 QB Rating
Warner 235/347, 3429 Yds, 9.8 YPA, 21 TD, 18 INT, 98.3 QB Rating


So by looking at the above numbers we see that Green, Bulger, and Martin all outperformed Warner when given the exact same team...

I'm not saying Bulger is horrid or a bottom 5 QB or anything like that, but I would say that calling him top 10 is somewhat generous and top 5 would be extreemly so. (I'd put him in that 11-15 catagory of starting QB's)