yankeehillbilly
FinHeaven VIP
- Joined
- May 7, 2004
- Messages
- 4,630
- Reaction score
- 2
- Age
- 58
No need for a QB anymore, now that we have Lemon....:couch:
PHINZ RULE!!!!
LOL
Good one
No need for a QB anymore, now that we have Lemon....:couch:
PHINZ RULE!!!!
That's just an imbecilic statement. The very problem with this football franchise over that last five miserable years is that bums keep getting 'anointed' the starting job without ever proving they deserve it.
Draft for the future with a 1st round pick; then hope to start that future on opening day.
This team has been so bad at QB for so long we really need a commitment from both the coaching staff and player personnel gurus to infuse new blood and build from within at this most critical position.
LOL
Good one
Ok Mr. GM what do you do with C-Pep, that large contract and the 2nd round pick you invested? You always have competition for starting jobs but C-Pep SHOULD start off #1 on the depth chart. If he can keep it-great....if not...may the best man win.
Nice backpedal you got there, maybe we should be starting you in our secondary!Finfanforever said:allow C-pep full recovery and he's the starter ...period.
Then what is the problem? I wanted a QB, so did many others. Just because you've screwed the pooch at this position before doesn't mean you don't keep trying to fix it. Even if that means spending another high-round pick.We do need to draft a QB THIS DRAFT. I said that last year both BEFORE and AFTER the C-PEP trade...and got blasted for it! Too many people were screaming for defense!
LOL
Good one
Just because you've screwed the pooch at this position before doesn't mean you don't keep trying to fix it. Even if that means spending another high-round pick.
We all need to get used to the idea that C-Pep will be the starter and JH and CL will be 2 &3(maybe not in that order).[/quote]
why do we have to get used that idea? why shouldn't c-pep have to prove himself? i completely disagree with the notion that because he was expensive to acquire we should stick with him. if he can't do the job, then why have it handed to him. prove it in training camp - whoever has the best training camp, wins the job. if culpepper is the qb you and others claim he is, it shouldn't be a problem for him, right? but draft a qb, because even if culpepper wins the job, he is still an aging veteran playing on a surgically reconstructed knee. no more trades, no more fa's at qb - draft and develop.
also, in a previous post, i failed to include drew stanton - excellent point, stanton would be great in the second or third (ahead of edwards and palko).
CTD, these Culpepper Apologists like Dredd fear an open competition at QB like the Bengals fear red and blue flashing lights. The last thing they want is a great young QB to expose Bumpepper for the indecisive disaster he is.why do we have to get used that idea? why shouldn't c-pep have to prove himself? i completely disagree with the notion that because he was expensive to acquire we should stick with him. if he can't do the job, then why have it handed to him. prove it in training camp - whoever has the best training camp, wins the job. if culpepper is the qb you and others claim he is, it shouldn't be a problem for him, right? but draft a qb, because even if culpepper wins the job, he is still an aging veteran playing on a surgically reconstructed knee. no more trades, no more fa's at qb - draft and develop.Dredd said:
We all need to get used to the idea that C-Pep will be the starter and JH and CL will be 2 &3(maybe not in that order).
also, in a previous post, i failed to include drew stanton - excellent point, stanton would be great in the second or third (ahead of edwards and palko).
Now that it is obvious to all that the Culpepper trade was a bust and that Harrington still sucks this team has to get a QB.
For years, most NFL scouts have been saying that Matt Schaub of Atlanta will be a good when given the chance.
Vick will never leave Atlanta.
The Fins need to go after this guy instead of any rookie in the draft.
We all need to get used to the idea that C-Pep will be the starter and JH and CL will be 2 &3(maybe not in that order).[/quote]
why do we have to get used that idea? why shouldn't c-pep have to prove himself? i completely disagree with the notion that because he was expensive to acquire we should stick with him. if he can't do the job, then why have it handed to him. prove it in training camp - whoever has the best training camp, wins the job. if culpepper is the qb you and others claim he is, it shouldn't be a problem for him, right? but draft a qb, because even if culpepper wins the job, he is still an aging veteran playing on a surgically reconstructed knee. no more trades, no more fa's at qb - draft and develop.
also, in a previous post, i failed to include drew stanton - excellent point, stanton would be great in the second or third (ahead of edwards and palko).
Culpepper will have the best camp if healthy. He is the most physically gifted which is what shows in camp, he won't be tested in game situations.
Well, that isn't what you said in your first post:
Nice backpedal you got there, maybe we should be starting you in our secondary!
And the 2nd-rounder is gone. We're not getting it back. So by your reasoning we should just keep losing behind this bum until that wasted pick was 'worth it'? Nice...
And Bumpepper's contract doesn't cost us anything if we do the smart thing and cut him now. The Vikes already paid his signing bonus and his contract doesn't balloon up until 2007, when he'll cost us $5.5 million under the cap.
Then what is the problem? I wanted a QB, so did many others. Just because you've screwed the pooch at this position before doesn't mean you don't keep trying to fix it. Even if that means spending another high-round pick.
Oh, you'd like that, wouldn't you?
Hopefully the coaching staff (whomever they may be) will realize what I've known since Spring 2006: Culpepper is an overrated bum who is a running quarterback that can no longer run. His fumbling, one-read-and-scramble, second-read-and-run talents will squander our season once again if he is handed the top job next year.
I predicted Culpepper would kill our season the day he was traded here. I was right then and I'm going on the record again - now - that the Dolphins will fall to disaster once more in 2007 if he remains in an aqua uniform.
Ditch the one-trick ponies for 2007 and get us a real field general!
You hear that everyone?! We should have kept Feeley.You totally misinterpreted what I said in my first post. I will clarify for you...C-Pep assuming fully healed should be the #1 on the depth chart going in. Then it's up to him to win the starting job. To simply cut a spent 2nd round price tag QB after 4 games (and not fully recovered)as your proposing, is really $tupid! :goof: God! I'm glad your not the GM...but then again you wouldn't last long with your philosophy anyway!:sidelol:
I think many fans in here need to embrace this thought. Build where there are needs that will keep this team from being successful in 07 and the future. Perhaps QB, but more glaring: OL, secondary, a #1 wideout....