what if...we traded B.Hartline? | Page 8 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

what if...we traded B.Hartline?

It was showing that there is a team that follows, word for word, your spoken philosophy. I mean, it was pretty point blank. You (and others) repeatedly have stated its more important to keep what you know instead of going after cheaper options that you do not know about. Stephen Jones said that damn near identically. If you cant see the connection(and the results of that philosophy) then i dont know what to tell you.

And great for the Steelers, they are a model of success, a very well run franchise. Now, ugh, were you going anywhere with that? No? Alright, but i like the Steelers example, so if you dont mind, lets examine them:
Despite spending a 3rd round pick on some scrub called Hines Ward, the Steelers spent the 8th overall pick on a receiver named Plaxico Burress. A mere 2 years after that, and a whooping 4 years after the Ward selection, the Steelers turned around and spent a 2nd round pick on Antwaan Randle El. After a few years it was clear ole' Plaxico was a bit of a nutjob so they shipped him off right before winning a Superbowl ring. Immediately after that they allowed Antwaan to seek greener pastures. Why did they do this?
Well, it could have been because they had some capable receivers in Ward and tight end Heath Miller, but i like to think its because they felt they could spend yet another first round pick on a receiver in the draft. Which they did. Named Santonio Holmes(who they traded up to get no less). Who became their Superbowl MVP for their second ring in 4 years. By that point they still had the ever capable Ward, the reliable Miller, the potentially game breaking Holmes, and the former 2nd round pick Limas Sweed. Pretty set receiving core, certainly they wouldnt consider upgrading it further.
But wait...the Steelers then drafted some little know receiver from Mississippi in the 3rd round. Some deep threat who left the Steelers for a lot more money from some Florida team, his name escapes me at the moment. Anyways, after Holmes proved difficult, they shipped him off to the Jets. After that, despite still having Ward, Sweed, former 3rd round deep threat whose name i totally forget at the moment, the Steelers packed it up and never spent another draft pick on a receiver again....oh, wait a minute, they did the exact opposite. They spent a 3rd round pick on a guy named Emmanuel Sanders(and a 6th on Antonio Brown, but thats not a high selection so i'll ignore it). In a complete coincidence, they were back in the Superbowl but, respectably, losing in a shootout against the Packers.
And then in 2013 they spent a 3rd round pick on Markus Wheatan. Yeah, i know thats sort of tacked on at the end.

According to you and others, the Steelers should never have invested in anyone after Hines and Burress. They shouldnt have traded away troubled players right before they went off the deep end. I mean, they were established, everyone else was unknown. Yet, they kept investing high draft picks in that position year after year.

Seriously people, first Detroit and now Pittsburgh. You all have to start picking better examples. :bobdole:

Winning teams give up on players when its in the best interest of the team to do so. Winning teams have the expectation of being able to replace that player. Winning teams understand how to scout. Winning teams understand they arent walking out of the draft with a "bunch of unknowns" but players they have studied for years and have a reasonable(if not complete or foolproof) understanding of what they can become. I vote we follow their model instead of doing what Dallas does: hang onto older, more expensive, players simply because "they are known". If someone is foolish enough to offer us anything above a 4th round pick for Hartline, you pull the trigger without hesitation. If its a 2nd round pick, you agree to the deal as quickly as possible so you can get off the phone before the other team hears you burst out laughing.
We aren't one player away from a Superbowl. Hartline is not going to make or break our season. Years of atrocious drafting have left us bereft of talent, this is going to take time to fix. The best way to get talent is the draft and the more draft picks we have the more chances we have of improving this roster.

Also, Hartline is turning 28 this season. Still in his prime, but distinctly not 26. Not to mention his age has nothing to do with him being an extremely average receiver who could be easily replaced with a vastly cheaper and younger player.

The Steelers had the worst offensive line in football and a mere average defense that could not stop the run when they needed it most, all of those years, and they still had the brass balls to concentrate on WR anyways.

Whats that you say? Quite the opposite? Oh.

Your post has excellent information (and sarcasm) but whats your point?

You wax poetic on WRs yet contradict yourself by saying we are not one player away hence, replacing one player- Hartline- is not going to make a difference, right?

You list all of the great options the Steelers had in place while continuing to roll the dice for the next best young receiver but isnt that the very reason why they could afford to continue to the roll the dice, because of those other options?

If we get a 2 for Hartline, that 2 should be used on the offensive line or a saftey or a LB. As you correctly stated, we are not one player away and we are damn sure not one WR away.

So what are the other options incase we dont hit on a 3rd round Hines Ward (seeing as that happens so very often)? Where's our Heath Miller?

I know we're bored but this is the problem with Dolphin fans. This is why there are so many bandwagon fans. Too many fans are like little children. They like shiny. Your post was shiny. :baby talk: and wook at our wittle yungrobbin and ldaniel7. You wike de shiny dont chu? Gwood wittle boys.

How many fans out there want a 1st round pick that is not an offensive linemen? They want shiny. We have zero necessity for shiny. We have no business, other than boredom, to be discussing trading Hartline, to be trying to fix a position that doesnt desperately need fixing and replacing a player that doesnt nearly need replacing.

Luxury- important word that word. Luxury. Say it with me. Luxury.

Today, we dont have the luxury to get Steelered out on WRs. We dont have the luxury of discussing Hartline. We dont (and didnt) have the luxury of Dion Jordan shiny. Until that day, why dont we shut da f- up about trading the best hands on our football team.
 
Also, I would love if we went back to back Notre Dame, Martin OL and Niklas at TE. Man that would make my day.. We need a true tight end and Niklas can run every freakn route in the TE tree. Plus he's tough as nail.. Then you have martin who can play anywhere on the oline. 2 top quality picks...
 
It was showing that there is a team that follows, word for word, your spoken philosophy. I mean, it was pretty point blank. You (and others) repeatedly have stated its more important to keep what you know instead of going after cheaper options that you do not know about. Stephen Jones said that damn near identically. If you cant see the connection(and the results of that philosophy) then i dont know what to tell you.

And great for the Steelers, they are a model of success, a very well run franchise. Now, ugh, were you going anywhere with that? No? Alright, but i like the Steelers example, so if you dont mind, lets examine them:
Despite spending a 3rd round pick on some scrub called Hines Ward, the Steelers spent the 8th overall pick on a receiver named Plaxico Burress. A mere 2 years after that, and a whooping 4 years after the Ward selection, the Steelers turned around and spent a 2nd round pick on Antwaan Randle El. After a few years it was clear ole' Plaxico was a bit of a nutjob so they shipped him off right before winning a Superbowl ring. Immediately after that they allowed Antwaan to seek greener pastures. Why did they do this?
Well, it could have been because they had some capable receivers in Ward and tight end Heath Miller, but i like to think its because they felt they could spend yet another first round pick on a receiver in the draft. Which they did. Named Santonio Holmes(who they traded up to get no less). Who became their Superbowl MVP for their second ring in 4 years. By that point they still had the ever capable Ward, the reliable Miller, the potentially game breaking Holmes, and the former 2nd round pick Limas Sweed. Pretty set receiving core, certainly they wouldnt consider upgrading it further.
But wait...the Steelers then drafted some little know receiver from Mississippi in the 3rd round. Some deep threat who left the Steelers for a lot more money from some Florida team, his name escapes me at the moment. Anyways, after Holmes proved difficult, they shipped him off to the Jets. After that, despite still having Ward, Sweed, former 3rd round deep threat whose name i totally forget at the moment, the Steelers packed it up and never spent another draft pick on a receiver again....oh, wait a minute, they did the exact opposite. They spent a 3rd round pick on a guy named Emmanuel Sanders(and a 6th on Antonio Brown, but thats not a high selection so i'll ignore it). In a complete coincidence, they were back in the Superbowl but, respectably, losing in a shootout against the Packers.
And then in 2013 they spent a 3rd round pick on Markus Wheatan. Yeah, i know thats sort of tacked on at the end.

According to you and others, the Steelers should never have invested in anyone after Hines and Burress. They shouldnt have traded away troubled players right before they went off the deep end. I mean, they were established, everyone else was unknown. Yet, they kept investing high draft picks in that position year after year.

Seriously people, first Detroit and now Pittsburgh. You all have to start picking better examples. :bobdole:

Winning teams give up on players when its in the best interest of the team to do so. Winning teams have the expectation of being able to replace that player. Winning teams understand how to scout. Winning teams understand they arent walking out of the draft with a "bunch of unknowns" but players they have studied for years and have a reasonable(if not complete or foolproof) understanding of what they can become. I vote we follow their model instead of doing what Dallas does: hang onto older, more expensive, players simply because "they are known". If someone is foolish enough to offer us anything above a 4th round pick for Hartline, you pull the trigger without hesitation. If its a 2nd round pick, you agree to the deal as quickly as possible so you can get off the phone before the other team hears you burst out laughing.
We aren't one player away from a Superbowl. Hartline is not going to make or break our season. Years of atrocious drafting have left us bereft of talent, this is going to take time to fix. The best way to get talent is the draft and the more draft picks we have the more chances we have of improving this roster.

Also, Hartline is turning 28 this season. Still in his prime, but distinctly not 26. Not to mention his age has nothing to do with him being an extremely average receiver who could be easily replaced with a vastly cheaper and younger player.

First, you brought up the Steelers, not me....you can attempt to make it sound like I am using a weak example but, I was just going on the one you gave...

Second, I just said in the previous post that I would be all for moving on from Hartline, if there was a player in place to take his spot. Right now the OL, LB, and DB, need to be addressed int he draft...why do they need to add another? One of the biggest issue with this team in the past was getting better in some areas, but downgrading in others....the filling holes by creating more holes philosophy of Ireland.

Third, you wrote a **** ton to basically say good teams are always trying to get better and younger, and I agree, the Dolphins should get younger and better....draft a WR if that young Wideout shows real promise then send Hartline off for a 3rd, 4th....who cares at that point....you have someone better. Again...I'm not against drafting to replace established player....I would just prefer to have someone in place to replace them before they do.....I don't want another Brandon Marshall trade to happen and the team be stuck with what they had in 2012 and end up with Dallas Thomas and Egnew in exchange for those picks.
 
Fantastic post.

"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

You do realize that the team has been doing just what he is suggesting the last few years....
 
The Steelers had the worst offensive line in football and a mere average defense that could not stop the run when they needed it most, all of those years, and they still had the brass balls to concentrate on WR anyways.

Whats that you say? Quite the opposite? Oh.

Your post has excellent information (and sarcasm) but whats your point?

You wax poetic on WRs yet contradict yourself by saying we are not one player away hence, replacing one player- Hartline- is not going to make a difference, right?

You list all of the great options the Steelers had in place while continuing to roll the dice for the next best young receiver but isnt that the very reason why they could afford to continue to the roll the dice, because of those other options?

If we get a 2 for Hartline, that 2 should be used on the offensive line or a saftey or a LB. As you correctly stated, we are not one player away and we are damn sure not one WR away.

So what are the other options incase we dont hit on a 3rd round Hines Ward (seeing as that happens so very often)? Where's our Heath Miller?

I know we're bored but this is the problem with Dolphin fans. This is why there are so many bandwagon fans. Too many fans are like little children. They like shiny. Your post was shiny. :baby talk: and wook at our wittle yungrobbin and ldaniel7. You wike de shiny dont chu? Gwood wittle boys.

How many fans out there want a 1st round pick that is not an offensive linemen? They want shiny. We have zero necessity for shiny. We have no business, other than boredom, to be discussing trading Hartline, to be trying to fix a position that doesnt desperately need fixing and replacing a player that doesnt nearly need replacing.

Luxury- important word that word. Luxury. Say it with me. Luxury.

Today, we dont have the luxury to get Steelered out on WRs. We dont have the luxury of discussing Hartline. We dont (and didnt) have the luxury of Dion Jordan shiny. Until that day, why dont we shut da f- up about trading the best hands on our football team.
Shiny is what wins you games in today's NFL. A high scoring offense is a necessity if you want to win anything meaningful, not a luxury. The past six years of overvaluing OL got us in the current position. Also, you are far more likely to find solid starters on OL in the third round. This isn't the case with WRs. A first round WR is much more likely to be a game changer whereas a first round OL will never set you over the top.
 
[wanders into thread]...trips over 30 yard line...[stands up, wanders out of thread]
 
If offered, I'd have to pull the trigger, but it is unlikely IMO. If Ireland was still the GM, I'd say there's no chance in hell that happens with Cleveland after he screwed them over last offseason.
 
IMO you build your football team by fixing your weakest links and systematically move your way up. You could always upgrade most positions on your football team as you'll never get a roster full of hall of famers. With the salary cap you always have to seek value in every move you make while also keeping your priorities straight. Now Hartline for a 2nd rounder would be great value overall except now you'd HAVE to draft a WR so your just trading Hartline for a WR in THIS draft hoping you get the same production from a rookie. Is it a GAMBLE we really NEED to make? Are there other much more pressing areas on this football team that need to be addressed before we start taking gambles on a position where there is no real concern? Hartline is what he is, a reliable good football player, good locker room guy... Hardly someone who needs to be replaced ASAP IMO... This is all moot because we're not getting someone to spit a 2nd rounder for Hartline.
 
So, you are saying Hartline isn't better than Wallace, but then go on to rip Wallace's ability, which means Hartline is even worse than what you present Wallace as (which is apparently being fully responsible for the lack of connection between he and Tannehill). And you don't think we'd be lucky to get a 2nd for that?

And yes, we have different qualifiers. I'll usually place the deep threat who can stretch the field and actually score TDs over the guy that can run 10 yards and fall down.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your "deep threat who can stretch the field and actually score TD's" had less yards, less catches, less avg/catch and only one more TD than Hartline. Yeah, he's leaps and bounds better. If these are your only criteria for talent than it looks like Wallace should be coming up short in your book as well.

Hell, seems like we'd be damn lucky to get a 2nd for Wallace. But I guess that's all on Tannehill.
 
Your "deep threat who can stretch the field and actually score TD's" had less yards, less catches, less avg/catch and only one more TD than Hartline. Yeah, he's leaps and bounds better. If these are your only criteria for talent than it looks like Wallace should be coming up short in your book as well.

Hell, seems like we'd be damn lucky to get a 2nd for Wallace. But I guess that's all on Tannehill.
yeah but Hartline has a much better QB feeding him... Oh wait!
 
Have to agree with Rob & others that nobody would give up a 2nd for Hartline because of his contract. He is grossly overpaid for his abilities. When you average 14 yards per catch and 2 TDs per season you're not really helping your team win games very well. Certainly not to the point of being worth 22 million over the next 3 years.
 
Your "deep threat who can stretch the field and actually score TD's" had less yards, less catches, less avg/catch and only one more TD than Hartline. Yeah, he's leaps and bounds better. If these are your only criteria for talent than it looks like Wallace should be coming up short in your book as well.

Hell, seems like we'd be damn lucky to get a 2nd for Wallace. But I guess that's all on Tannehill.

So, you think Wallace was utilized correctly? You really see no difference between the two receivers in their style of play and how they should be used? The only time Tannehill and wallace were able to link up on a regular basis is when Wallace was running similar routes as Hartline. That's a horrible use of him, but there was little choice considering Tannehill's inability to hit him deep (all Wallace's fault, apparently, though roethlisberger never seemed to have that problem).

For the record, I'd be okay if they traded Wallace too. He absolutely is coming up short, but for a different reason. It's beginning to look like he's one of those players who can't reach his full potential, for whatever reason. His ceiling is far higher than Hartline (who probably hit his with that career record 4 TDs), but for a variety of reasons, he can't seem to take the next step. This is a business. Everybody has a price, though I'd prefer to give Tannehill another year. I'm loyal to the team, not the players.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---------- Post added at 10:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:28 AM ----------

yeah but Hartline has a much better QB feeding him... Oh wait!

So, they are the same style of receivers? You feel Wallace was used correctly?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Have to agree with Rob & others that nobody would give up a 2nd for Hartline because of his contract. He is grossly overpaid for his abilities. When you average 14 yards per catch and 2 TDs per season you're not really helping your team win games very well. Certainly not to the point of being worth 22 million over the next 3 years.

Well Detroit certainly thought Golden Tate was worth it considering he got almost the same contract for the same production and for the record I'm not comparing the two in style or production, just stats for stats, money for money.

Whether or not they are worth their contracts remains to be seen.
 
So, you think Wallace was utilized correctly? You really see no difference between the two receivers in their style of play and how they should be used? The only time Tannehill and wallace were able to link up on a regular basis is when Wallace was running similar routes as Hartline. That's a horrible use of him, but there was little choice considering Tannehill's inability to hit him deep (all Wallace's fault, apparently, though roethlisberger never seemed to have that problem).

For the record, I'd be okay if they traded Wallace too. He absolutely is coming up short, but for a different reason. It's beginning to look like he's one of those players who can't reach his full potential, for whatever reason. His ceiling is far higher than Hartline (who probably hit his with that career record 4 TDs), but for a variety of reasons, he can't seem to take the next step. This is a business. Everybody has a price, though I'd prefer to give Tannehill another year. I'm loyal to the team, not the players.

No, Wallace was absolutely not utilized correctly. I mentioned this in another thread but I'll reiterate: I hope the rumors of Lazor utilizing Wallace's abilities (ie speed) correctly and creating mismatches are true. Sherman had no freakin clue what he was doing with him, or with Tanny for that matter. All I know is what I saw on the field. No, Hartline doesn't have blazing speed. Yes, he does seem to get mysteriously tripped up at times by the turf. But, I saw him run every route, more often than not successfully, including Wallace's bread and butter route, the deep one. It never seemed like there was a "need" to feed him the ball by designing plays that were outside of his comfort zone, mostly because he seemed comfortable running any route.

I don't think either guy is a number one WR in this league. I hope I'm wrong. Wallace definately has the higher ceiling and could be a number one but he needs a lot of work in every area of his game except speed to get there. Crisper routes. Better hands. More effort. The ability to leave his feet.

Hartline is definately a number two. All that said, if we had to offload one of the two of them, I'd rather see Wallace go and replace him with a guy who is definately a number one to go along with the number two in Hartline. Just my opinion.
 
Back
Top Bottom