sufferingfinfan
Practice Squad
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2014
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
This one's easy. Ross.
Wrote this a while ago
If you knew then what you know now, would Tannehill be added as one of the choices?
Serious question - was the decision to draft Tannehill with the #8 pick:
100% Ireland
50% Ireland, 50% Philbin
33%, Ireland, 33% Philbin, 33% Sherman
50% Ross, 50% Ireland
some other combination
Or I guess some would say Tannehill was the correct pick but it is 100% on the coaches for his lack of development.
I'm usually pretty consistent in the belief that you own what you own (GM gets credit for personnel, head coach gets credit for schemes, starters, assistants, QB owns his stats, o-line owns sacks, etc, etc) but the one exception is I believe choosing the QB is a collaborative effort. So it doesn't really matter to me who owns what percentage, if they failed they all failed.
The one thing I appreciate, and I've said this many times, that under Philbin's system we'd find out sooner rather than later what we had in Tannehill. It was a sink or swim approach and just when it looked like we might have had a swimmer, he panicked and drowned. This is not a bad outcome for me and its not even close to the worst case scenario.
To be fair to Hickey, his draft seems very good.
When you look at San Diego and the massive Oline they have, together with the 3-4 D, Ireland did leave a talented roster that was overhauled due to scheme. With McCoy, I feel it would have been an ideal fit.
Agreed, which is probably why Ireland favored McCoy over Philbin. Ross must love dysfunction because he has made a habit out of pairing together management folks that aren't on the same page, in fact, even creating a schism where there wasn't one previously with the way Sparano was handled in that final year.