and yet still more successful than the guy in your sig.
The one that is a starter compared to your guy...the backup. No, I diagree.
and yet still more successful than the guy in your sig.
The one that is a starter compared to your guy...the backup. No, I diagree.
Tampa Bay had a fantastic game. They don't play that well the rest of the year. Same as when Miami played Houston. It happens. Yet you keep pointing out that last year Philly averaged like 30 ppg with Sanchez at QB, so it isn't inconceivable to think they could've been in the game yesterday with him at the helm.
Sanchez is more skilled at throwing the INT multiple times, TDs he only knows how to throw sparingly.
don't worry, your guy will be a backup soon enough.
more skilled at winning too.
It's scary how much Junc seems to be obsessed with Sanchez. Fun for the board though.
Sanchez hasnt been that great at winning since 2011 in fact not much diff than Tannehill
Of course he will, with the way he seems to look better each year, in a few years, he will be the 1st backup that threw 40 TDs to 15 INTs and 4500 yards the year before.
Yea, I saw that last week when both played in the same game.
20 years from now junc will still be trolling this forum talking about the great Mark Sanchez.
Can't see how Dolphins fans are ragging on other QB's lol. I'm sure all fans are envious of our under 500 QB.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There's no obsession, you guys are the ones obsessed. I discuss the topics and bring reality to all discussions. if you guys didn't inaccurately post about him I wouldn't discuss him.
We were specifically told that Philadelphia would be a better team with Sanchez at the helm than they were with Sam Bradford. So far they have not. That is a fact, not ragging.
Explain how we're obsessed.