Originally posted by TigerJ
This has been a strange thread to read. Jay is better than so and so. So and so is better than Jay. Jay is one of the new breed of QBs in the NFL. Great ones like Marino and Kelly seem harder to come by, so teams are going with QBs that play within themselves and don't lose. Brady and Griese are others in that mold. If I were to waste my time trying to rank all the QBs in the NFL, I know I'd come up with a bunch that are better than Jay. I'd love to have McNabb. Until he proves he's more than just a great athlete trying to play QB, I'm not sure I'd want Michael Vick. If I had the right team, I could live with Jay. For the most part, I still think games are won and lost on the line of scrimmage.
BTW, I think New York (Jets) is in a pickle over their QB situation. They would dearly like to bench Testaverde, who is well past his prime, but Pennington has been so slow to learn the offence I think some are doubting he'll ever be able to start.
I wouldn't want to be a team depending on a rookie (Harrington, Carr, Ramsey). I think rookie QBs that can start and win in the NFL come along maybe once a decade. Manning was the last. Maybe Manning (Eli) will be the next.