Super_Duper85
Deep Threat
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2002
- Messages
- 149
- Reaction score
- 0
I know people might be biased like myself, but can Dan Marino be the best qb ever, even without a ring?? I say yes, because in his case, he holds every major passing record. What I never understand about this question is if you are asking who the best INDIVIDUAL is, then why are TEAM accomplishments lumped into the equation. A ring symbolizes that you played for the best teams (which Dan did not). In Dan's case, he made his team better. He legitimately gave Miami a chance to win every game. I don't think Montana would have won many titles if he played on the teams Marino did. Conversley, if Marino played for the 49ers, he may have become arguably the best football player ever (based on # of rings because I think he would have won many). Any thoughts?? Would you rather have Dan than any other qb?? If not, who would you rather have and why??? I would take Dan no matter what.