Gladsadmad
Active Roster
DolFinatic718 said:Ok and? NO one said he was Marino
He doesn't have to be Marino. I would settle for Jake Delhomme, i.e. someone who comes up big when the game is on the line.
DolFinatic718 said:Ok and? NO one said he was Marino
Yes, that is the key component championship quarterbacks seem to possess, and I'm sorry for all the Fiedler lovers, but he doesn't have that.Gladsadmad said:He doesn't have to be Marino. I would settle for Jake Delhomme, i.e. someone who comes up big when the game is on the line.
Gladsadmad said:Here are some stats for ya mister...
Jay Fiedler has thrown at least 1 INT in 37 out of 58 games he has played as a Dolphin.
the breakdown..
2000- 15 games, 9 w/ an INT
2001- 16 games, 10 w/ an INT
2002- 11 games, 6 w/ an INT
2003- 12 games, 8 w/ an INT
oh yeah, and in the playoffs..he played 4 games...he threw INT's in all 4 games!
We win in SPITE of him.
rafael said:You realize that this is a very poor argument.
Brett Favre 193 games played, 209 ints.
Exactly.Gladsadmad said:Here are some stats for ya mister...
Jay Fiedler has thrown at least 1 INT in 37 out of 58 games he has played as a Dolphin.
the breakdown..
2000- 15 games, 9 w/ an INT
2001- 16 games, 10 w/ an INT
2002- 11 games, 6 w/ an INT
2003- 12 games, 8 w/ an INT
oh yeah, and in the playoffs..he played 4 games...he threw INT's in all 4 games!
We win in SPITE of him.
Finsflurry said:Well now, how about we actually do some stats that matter...like Jay's performance in our last 4 games of the year and the playoffs, why don't we take a look.
2003
13-31, 111 yds, 41.9 comp %, 0 TD, 2 int, 25.1 rating
21-40, 240 yds, 52 %, 0 TD, 2 int, 50 rating
8-17, 46 yds, 47.1 %, 1 TD, 1 int, 48.9 rating
21-29, 328 yds, 72.4 %, 1 TD, 1 int, 106.7 rating (game didn't matter)
2002
15-29, 196 yds, 51.7 %, 1 TD, 1 int, 70.5 rating
21-32, 237 yds, 65.6 %, 1 TD, 0 int, 98 rating
15-21, 177 yds, 71.4 %, 2 TD, 1 int, 108.6 rating
11-25, 140 yds, 44 %, 1 TD, 0 int, 70 rating
2001
16-28, 149 yds, 57.1 %, 0 TD, 3 int, 32.3 rating
21-37, 320 yds, 56.8 %, 1 Td, 0 int, 94.4 rating
16-29, 191 yds, 55.2 %, 2 Td, 1 int, 84.1 rating
9-16, 110 yds, 56.3 %, 1 TD, 0 int, 98 rating
2000
13-21, 200 yds, 56 %, 3 td, 0 int, 113 rating
13-28, 175 yds, 42 %, 1 Td, 4 int, 44 rating
12-25, 150 yds, 48 %, 0 TD, 1 int, 65 rating
30-45, 240 yds, 66 %, 0 Td, 0 int, 88 rating
Playoffs
19-34, 185 yds, 54 %, 1 Td, 3 int, 52 rating
18-37, 176 yds, 49 %, 0 td, 3 int, 21 rating
15-28, 122 yds, 53 %, 0 Td, 1 int, 50 rating
Which equals about 160 yards a game, 16 tds, 24 interceptions, a horrible pass completion % and an even worse qb rating...so what's the excuse now?
Dolfan954 said:How do you know that?
The elite QBs are going to have some INTs by the very nature of their play. They are good and know it so they will attempt to "thread the needle" sometimes. Also, the playcalling will ask more of an elite QB than a caretaker, resulting in more attempts and thus more chances for more INTs. However, as mentioned earlier, the great QBs offset their INTs. Not just with TDs, but with the perfect pass between 2 or 3 defenders for a first down....or hitting receivers in stride for big gains, or even the improved running game due to opposing defenses having to respect the QB because at any given moment he could kill them with a perfect strike. I just dont think Jay brings any of those qualities to the table to offset his INTs.rafael said:You realize that this is a very poor argument.
Brett Favre 193 games played, 209 ints.
I'm not saying he's Favre. I'm saying all QBs throw ints and are inaccurate at times. JF is/has been avg. He is not more inaccurate or more int prone than most QBs. People's perceptions are skewed. I don't know if it's b/c of Marino or b/c they only remember/see the other QBs in the highlights. Whatever the reason, JF's numbers have been avg. This is a fact. His win percentage is above avg. This is also a fact. It could be b/c he's had a great D or b/c he manages the game well. Whatever people think the reason is, is opinion. There are no facts that can prove this.
Finsflurry said:Because Feeley is no where near as good as Lucas or Brian Griese.
Ok pal, I want some of that crack and immediately, you could make a case that Griese is better cause he's accomplished something, but come on, Pucas? That's why his *** can't even find a job in this league and he never was considered to be a starter anywhere he went. Come on man, you're insulting my intelligence.