No we actually find Vaark very funny and you're funny too but not in a good way!
That's says more about you than me if you really think his amateur photoshops are funny.
No we actually find Vaark very funny and you're funny too but not in a good way!
Either way the jets come out on top though, right?
so just as good in 2010 kind of meaning that we were on a similar level, right? which has been the point of this discussion. Thanks for clearing it up.
bal and Pitt are 2 very good teams in most years but they wouldn't be hosting any playoff games(unless they were a 5 seed and faced a 6 seed in the title game which almost happened for the Jets in '09, had bal beaten Indy the week before the Jets would have hosted Bal in the title game) if they were in a division w/ NE.
The utter lack of self-awareness of some individuals widely considered to be azzclowns across several fan sites is both curious and mind-boggling.. Just sayin':idk::
If you include the Jets wins against Indy and Cincy, they come out on top of Pitt by 1 game in 2009.
They played common games, but the number of times they played certain teams is different. They each played their division opponents twice while playing the East/North just once. Meaning the Jets only had to play Pitt, Bal Cincy, Cle just once while playing NE, Mia, Buff twice. Pitt and Bal played Mia, NE, Jets, Buff, just once while playing their division opponents twice. Just becasue they have the same record, doesn't mean they were on the same level. The more important stat is head to head. The Jets are 0-1 against Bal, and 1-1 against Pitt, including the loss in the AFCC game, which is more important than the 5 point win the Jets had against them in the regular season.
Bal and Pitt have been much better than the Jets, Mia, or Buff have been in a long time. Either team would have ben able to challenge NE for a division title in at least 5 of the 12 years NE has won it.
this ...... Twicehow does every single thread get derailed about bull**** po appearances.
Nobody gives a **** and frankly i'm getting tired of seeing it.
Just stop arguing over nothing all the goddamn time.
Pitt didn't play Indy in 2009 and if we remove Cincy then we need to remove Miami for Pitt in week 17.
against reg season teams:
(Cin, Oak, Mia, Ten)
NYJ: 3-2
Pitt: 2-3
reg and postseason:
(Cin, Oak, Mia, Ten, SD)
NYJ: 5-2
Pitt: 2-3
NE in NFC North w/ Pitt or Bal: still win 4 games b/c they'd play Cin/Cle 4 times then would split w/ Bal or Pitt so that's 5-1 like they always seem to be in our division(or 6-0).
The Jets had to go to Pitt b/c they couldn't beat out NE, if the '10 title game is at home the Jets beat pitt. Switch the Jets and Pitt in 2010 and the Jets go 12-4 and win the AFC North and host the title game IF another team beats NE in the div rd.
Don't put us w/ Mia and Buf- 2 teams combining for ONE playoff app and ZERO playoff wins since 2002. We are just behind bal, Bal pulled away w/ this postseason but heading into it we were almost in a dead heat over the last decade.
How does every single thread get derailed about bull**** PO appearances.
Nobody gives a **** and frankly I'm getting tired of seeing it.
Just stop arguing over nothing.
am I allowed to respond or is this being shut down? I don't see the issue w/ two knowledgeable posters debating, we let so many goofball posters who know nothing ruin threads and now we have a good one w/ 2 guys who know their stuff so I'm not sure what the issue is.
Let me know.
I don't see why not? This is the Beast of the AFCE forum. I could understand a little more if this were in the main forum, but it is not. If we can't debate about this silly stuff here, then where can we? With that said, I'm cool with moving on to something else if you are.