Average. One TD pass a game is not going to cut it. And for all you Mike Wallace Haters. Dude is open 24/7. Just need a QB who can throw a Long Ball
Sure, and all those drops Wallace had early in the season never happened....it's all Tannehill.
Average. One TD pass a game is not going to cut it. And for all you Mike Wallace Haters. Dude is open 24/7. Just need a QB who can throw a Long Ball
Can you imagine something everyone here can agree on...not me.
It's a timing based route which is why it's late.Ok, Wallace had to wait for the football on both of those passes. That means it was undertrown. Yes they wre completed but tht was thanks to Walllace making 2 great plays on te ball. You can call it late if you want but when the WR has to wait for the ball to me it means it was under.
Ozzy rules!!
Can you imagine something everyone here can agree on...not me.
What I see hre it's very simple to me. Once a poster on this board takes sides with a player, coach or GM, there's no turning bad. The people that like Tannehill think he's just perfect nd nothing is his fault. The ones that don't like him think he sucks and everything is his fault. I like Tannehill and feel he does a lot of good things but the deep ball is NOT one of them at this point. Will he ever get better at it? It's posible but we'll have to wait an see. Now unless you're bias you should be able to see that he had Wallace open for 3 TD's and fisfired on all 3.
Ozzy rules!!
---------- Post added at 05:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:47 PM ----------
Ozzy rules, everyone should agree.
Ozzy rules!!
? Tannehill engineered a game-winning drive in the final minuteWe never played Seattle. I don't know what you're talking about. Ryan Tannehill has never played the Seattle Seahawks.
? Tannehill engineered a game-winning drive in the final minute
http://espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=321125015
No he didn't.
No he didn't.
The 60 yard bomb at the end of the game was catchable. Just saying.
This is a gross simplification of posters on this board, and it's not an accurate assessment of this particular discussion.
When Leroy Hoard said the same thing I said, was he being an idiot homer? He has been very critical of Ryan Tannehill. When CK not only mentioned the same things I did, but explained them in detail, was he being an idiot homer? He's also been extremely critical of Ryan Tannehill.
I'm sorry if you can't see anything more than "BALL DID NOT GO OVER RECEIVER'S HEAD WITHOUT HIM BREAKING STRIDE, BAD THROW UNDERTHROW" when you watch the play. That isn't my fault and it's certainly not a reflection on my ability to watch a play and make a judgment about it. There were two incredibly bad plays made by Ryan Tannehill yesterday, and hilariously, these are not the plays being used to bash him today.