But each of those players could be BPA at those picks, if any of them are still on the board at those picks.
I would love that draft.
Lets ask Boomer and CK!!
- Thread starter fullerboy1
- Start date
But each of those players could be BPA at those picks, if any of them are still on the board at those picks.
I would love that draft.
The Confessor
Doesnt play well with others
..and I think you are right, it is hard to do two things at the same time I guess. If you shoot for inside the 15 (Which is where punters are taught to aim for as it is thought that a 10 yard bounce is pretty common) than it is to shoot for one side of a RIGHT triangle created by the sideline and the 5 yard line.
I grew up with a kid that practiced hitting the corner, he practiced day and night....when High School came along, he was tiny for a punter, but dang if he couldnt nail that "Coffin Corner", and in fact, even when he was kicking out of his own end-zone, he went for nailing the side-marker as deep as he knew he could kick. No return Nate we used to call him...
He's a very good player. This is probably your best bet for my opinion on him. I think he's probably pretty likely at 9.
http://www.finheaven.com/boardvb2/showthread.php?t=190505&highlight=Boomer's+Look+at+Joe+Staley
MSU were better in 2005. In 2006 he had a pair of concussions, a lot of niggling injuries and the OL play was really medicore
I'm not a fan, personally.
Well, Brown would be drafted to start at LT, and hopefully he'd play every snap. Ginn's impact would be more obvious. Depending on whether Anthony Alabi can start at LT, Ginn might be the more impactful.
Not sure about my numbers? How's Russell, Quinn, Kolb, Trent edwards, John Beck, Drew Stanton, straight off the bat?
Well, you're looking at guys who can play man - so a Chris Houston or an Aaron Ross are corners we would be interested in, whilst a Daymeion Hughes, a zone corner, isn't.
Meriweather I think will not be picked by Miami - just too many question marks off the field. Cameron had a long meeting with Don Shula about the very point of getting guys with good character, so whilst he's a good player, I don't think we'd pick him.
I'd be very surprised if all those you listed go in the first 60 picks.
You'd never pass on a player because you like a guy coming out the following year. So much can happen - you could win the SB and put you out of his reach or he could get injuured, etc.
Good player, can play some corner, but his off field issues might preclude us from going there.
It's just not a discipline that gets taught so much anymore and so kids don't practice it.
No. Jay Feeley is one of the best kickers in the game. With the money invested in him, there's no way we draft one.
Well, we'll see won't we.
Yeah, but I think 4 QBs in the first 100 is more likely than 6 in the top 60. Can't wait till next weekend.
So you think that 2 from Beck, edwards, Kolb and Stanton will fall into day 2?
Not happening.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2004
- Messages
- 7,870
- Reaction score
- 8,080
I would not touch Stanton or even Edwards in round 2.
I have seen alot of Stanton, and whilst he is a good athlete, he does just enough to lose games. His intangibles are awful, doesn't see the field well, makes losing plays etc. Can Cam fix those issues? I wouldn't want us to try.
As between Beck and Kolb, the logical choice would be Beck over Kolb. My sense is that they are better prospects than Edwards and Stanton.
I have seen alot of Stanton, and whilst he is a good athlete, he does just enough to lose games. His intangibles are awful, doesn't see the field well, makes losing plays etc. Can Cam fix those issues? I wouldn't want us to try.
As between Beck and Kolb, the logical choice would be Beck over Kolb. My sense is that they are better prospects than Edwards and Stanton.