What ever makes you sleep at night. :crazy:
so you think comparing NE and Indy from 1999-2008 is the same as comparing a 1 year difference from Bal '08 to Bal '09?
What ever makes you sleep at night. :crazy:
On an apples to apples comparison of the first 14 games of the season (no way we should factor in 2 "laydown" concession games and maintain the validity of this), the combined record of the 09 Ravens' opponents was 127-97 (.567) vs the combined record of the 09 jets opponents of 108-116 (.491).
Factoring in the level of competition faced, it's easy to justify the nominal points allowed/game difference advantage by the Jets. As a matter of fact, considering the level of competition, the Rex-less Ravens stats look all the more impressive on their own merits, not to mention when bracketed against the Jest stats. Bottom line: the 09 Rexless Ravens opponents through the 1st 14 games won 19 more games while losing 19 fewer games than did the Jest opponents.
They also played paper tigers like the 11-5 Miami dolphins to make the opposing records look better. The bottom line is our D was better than bal's D this year and Bal's D last year was better than their D this year.
They also played paper tigers like the 11-5 Miami dolphins to make the opposing records look better. The bottom line is our D was better than bal's D this year and Bal's D last year was better than their D this year.
sorry.. but the bottom line is the bottom line. Over the 1st 14 meaningful games in 09, there was a 38 game difference in opponent degree of difficulty making any nominal jest stat advantage moot , or even pro-Ravens in the perspective of reality unless you're a stat nerd. But keep on spinning.:up:.
win % means nothing, who cares if you win 9-10 games and don't win playoff games or even make the postseason? we were 9-7 in 2008 and missed the playoffs, it was a failure of a year.
"You have won more games than anyone. period"? really? Miami has 387 wins:
Cards: 483
Bears: 693
Browns: 480
Cowboys: 434
Broncos: 394
Lions: 490
packers: 654
Colts: 441
Vikings: 407
Pats: 387
Giants: 626
Raiders: 410
Eagles: 499
Steelers: 529
49ers: 503
Rams: 504
Redskins: 541
"getting raped by peyton manning"? We lost by 13 pts, the AVERAGE Miami postseason loss in your history is 17 points.
highest winning %
winning playoff games doesn't mean **** either
you are so easy 4286:
:lol2::lol2: But you told me it was a FACT that Miami had more wins than any other team.:lol2::lol2:
We played 4 common teams: Indy, Cincy, NE and SD
In those games Bal averaged allowing7 games)
-19.7 PPG
-348 yds per game
In those games NYJ averaged allowing7 games)
-15 PPG
-308 YPG
i said winning % multiple times
you like facts right? well we have won more games than anyone. period.
I hope you didn't count Cinci's laydown game and certainly not the Casey Painter fiasco. And I'm talking about the first 14 games of the season... so I'm not including SD. Peyton's slicing and dicing of your D validated the widespread belief that you should have been 8-8 at best and never even sniffed the POs. So I look at your playoff record like I would a great TD throw and reception that gets called back for a holding penalty.
Again, you feasted on cupcake teams to fatten your stats... The Ravens played teams that both won 19 games more than your opponents and lost 19 less. You can continue to shake the trees to make your convenient stats fall out, but unless you're committed to justifying a farce season that was really 8-8 or more likely 7-7-2, you'll by intent, fail to see the surrounding forest. I understand that.
nyjunc...you need to get a life, seriously. you knew exactly what I was talking about.
we have the highest winning % of any nfl team
you like facts right? well we have won more games than anyone. period.
If that was the case why did you also write about win%?
You were wrong, just admit it and move on.