I'll default to my 2023 offseason perspective. I knew we'd score points but I didn't have high hopes for postseason success because the defensive personnel simply wasn't good enough.
I'll stick with that. It's unfortunate the marquee defenders got hurt late. The defense would have been exposed anyway. There would be greater clarity toward this question. When a regulator like Raekwon Davis is receiving high snap count you're not aspiring very high.
I don't know how anybody could watch Baltimore/Kansas City -- or look at their regular season stats -- and think we're in the same defensive category. Those teams bullied up front and eliminated open spaces in a flash.
IMO, there's not a heck of a lot of difference between offensive lines from one team to the next. I know I'm mostly alone there.But sample fan forums. Virtually every fan base complains about its offensive line. The 3 categories everybody whines about are officiating, injuries and offensive line. Check the offensive line rankings, where there is huge disagreement from one source to the next. And that was also true when I worked in a stats office 20 years ago. There were two outfits were considered parallel. The greatest variance was offensive line. Everybody was using different numbers and therefore conclusions.
As long as you're not inept at offensive line, you're sufficient. The college examples don't work, IMO. Those programs can invest heavily via targeted recruiting and it's considerably more of a run oriented sport. Heck, when I attended Michigan/Penn State a few months ago, Michigan didn't attempt one pass in the second half.
When was the last time the Dolphins had a linebacker? I know we've technically had some guys who are listed as such. And I can't remember the last time I saw an errant throw and had any confidence that one of our safeties would be there.