MadDawg020
SmartGuy
I think the title of your Thread is the problem.
If you would have stated this opinion first..alot more people would agree with you and I would be one. Yet when you state that that "we" know more than the FO does...it takes away from your arguement. Have we drafted well in the past few years..no way!. Does that mean that some laymen off the street would do a better job?...lets be realistic. You have every right to have little faith in thier judgement...track record has been iffy at best. Yet I would never assume no matter how much I love football..research it..view it...that I would know someone elses job better than he would.
But now you're just getting into semantics. I define knowledge as being based on results, not just knowing for the sake of knowing; that gets you nothing, as we've learned. It's like getting grades. If some guy keeps getting C's and D's in a class, you conclude he isn't very knowledgeable about teh subject matter correct?
That's the same situation here. The FO has been getting C's and D's the last decade, yet people still wan't to believe that they are knowledgeable in what they are doing. I don't care about effort, just like teachers don't care about how long you study. It's about results, and as such, how can we reach any other conclusion other than they are NOT knowledgeable?