Just more shouright data distortional gobbledegook!
Matt Ryan, who until this season, never met the second half of a win or go home game where he didn't melt, between 2013-15, won 4 less games than Tannehill despite better OLs, the TE GOAT and at times among the best receivers on the planet. Between '13 and '14, again despite all MRyan's assets, he won a combined 6 less games than Tannehill. (Tannehill's 2nd and 3rd year). In 2014 and '15, they won the same number of games despite it being the 7th and 8th year of experience for Matt vs the 3rd and 4th year for Tannehill.
If it took 9 years for Matt Ryan to reach his potential, there's absolutely no empirical argument that after 5 years experience, Tannehill's potential has flatlined. (Oh, that's unless you also want to throw Melty out with the bathwater too LOL)
All the shouwrongfulness might be nicely shoveled, but still it's BS.