The hardest piece of the puzzle to find is the quarterback and Buffalo is farther ahead in this than either Miami or New York.
What???? Losman isn't close to Chad.
The hardest piece of the puzzle to find is the quarterback and Buffalo is farther ahead in this than either Miami or New York.
Well, if Pennington hasn't done anything yet, then Losman isn't even on the list. When healthy, and he has been of late, Penny is a very good QB, and is far from a "prospect."
Dirtywater!
Yeah, while Loseman might still be a project with huge upside (I personally have not seen it)
Pop in a tape of the 2nd Jets game, the Jacksonville game, the Miami game, and the Houston game, among others.
:wink:
Yeah, what's the point? he led you to 7 wins,
What I said had zero to do with Chad, first off. So I don't know where you're going with that one based on the comment I made.
Second of all, BZ said he didn't see the upside of JP that others see. I suggested he take a look at the games I listed, and he'll see why Losman has a great upside.
And what do you mean he led us to 7 wins? Is it his job to stop the run? Cover receivers? Make tackles? The 7-9 record, which was an improvement over 2005, was not all on Losman.
Very Well Put!!:kick:
I try and argue this all the time---a few arguments wth NYJunc. Why the QB is given the props for wins and losses is beyond me....especially in the ultimate team game. Is he a major proponent in the win? Yes. Moreso than other positions? Yes. But, is the QB the direct correlation to wins and losses? No. We won 5 games in a row, with Joey Harrington having a QB rating over 70 in one of those!!
The Homer in me says the Phins.
The realist has to say the Jets at this time.
What I said had zero to do with Chad, first off. So I don't know where you're going with that one based on the comment I made.
Second of all, BZ said he didn't see the upside of JP that others see. I suggested he take a look at the games I listed, and he'll see why Losman has a great upside.
And what do you mean he led us to 7 wins? Is it his job to stop the run? Cover receivers? Make tackles? The 7-9 record, which was an improvement over 2005, was not all on Losman.
Touchy??
Nope, not at all. I was just wondering where he got Chad Pennington from my post about Losman. I didn't know where it was coming from.
I was doped up on Thorazine at the time. :goof:I have to quote this in a sig somewhere!!:kick:
What I said had zero to do with Chad, first off. So I don't know where you're going with that one based on the comment I made.
Second of all, BZ said he didn't see the upside of JP that others see. I suggested he take a look at the games I listed, and he'll see why Losman has a great upside.
And what do you mean he led us to 7 wins? Is it his job to stop the run? Cover receivers? Make tackles? The 7-9 record, which was an improvement over 2005, was not all on Losman.
Very Well Put!!:kick:
I try and argue this all the time---a few arguments wth NYJunc. Why the QB is given the props for wins and losses is beyond me....especially in the ultimate team game. Is he a major proponent in the win? Yes. Moreso than other positions? Yes. But, is the QB the direct correlation to wins and losses? No. We won 5 games in a row, with Joey Harrington having a QB rating over 70 in one of those!!
Nope, not at all. I was just wondering where he got Chad Pennington from my post about Losman. I didn't know where it was coming from.
Similar to the 'Sabres' comment in this thread. :)