If so, what would you be willing to give up?
I'd rather trade up for Haskins, Wilson is overrated and people will realize that if he dares to leave a running QB's paradise in Seattle.
Haskins is much more talented than RW with far greater upside, I wouldn't be surprised at all if he ends up a better pro than Murray and everyone else in the class.
Then there's the 2020 class to consider...
Between my family of 5 (and we drink a ton of milk) we maybe go through 5 gallons a week...that's a lot of milk hombre, a lot of milk.
Rw is going get his money but paying one man so much money hurt other part of team.
yes I can agree to what u are saying. Viking gave money to avg qb. now they cant make playoff.Teams waste a lot of resources. Seattle had a ton of needs going into 2018. Many had them as a bottom-5 roster, and they went and drafted a RB in the 1st. If you're giving big money to a mediocre QB, it will be very difficult to field a competitive team. If you're paying a top-tier QB like Wilson, he elevates the team enough to make it work.
No... just no.
I NEVER want a QB who runs the ball. It is difficult enough to keep your QB healthy in the NFL, and older running QBs are... well, worthless.
I'm not buying the Murray hype, I thought RG3 was a bum... give me a QB who remains in the backfield.
I know I mean Russel Wilson has missed....hold on that can't be right...
He's missed zero games?
Maybe he actually knows how to run the ball without taking big hits, it is almost as if some players are better at things then others.