teams would kill to have a insurance policy at rb like ricky for a whole 600,000 a year....in the world of salary cap thats a whole lot of player....carr is as unknown as cutler......
BROGS said:teams would kill to have a insurance policy at rb like ricky for a whole 600,000 a year....in the world of salary cap thats a whole lot of player....carr is as unknown as cutler......
rafael said:The only logical reason to reject that trade is if you don't think Carr is good. If you think Carr is a franchise QB then all the other reasons given are ridiculous. QB is the most important position. It wouldn't matter if RW were the best back in the league (he isn't). It wouldn't matter if RB were injured. It wouldn't matter that he's an insurance policy. etc. None of that would matter b/c having a balanced offense makes your team better. If you think that having two rbs is better than having a QB and an rb then you don't understand modern football.
Ark139954 said:u and me both know that foster is the starter aswell as parker. bettis is a change of pace back.
....we don't have two probowl running backs.nopony said:Are you kidding??? Which of those teams... or the other playoff teams... has TWO probowl quality backs?
Are you trying to suggest that if we trade Ricky we aren't allowed to have ANYBODY play second tailback?
I wouldn't think that the biggest Ricky Williams fan in the world could say with a straight face that a second tailback is more important than a first quarterback.
That's just ridiculous.