Mac Jones a top 10 pick is laughable. And I will literally laugh. Like I did when the Giants took Jones and the bears took the Turd.
Because Tua was better than Mac Jones. Jones is really good, but there was a reason why games were over at halftime with Tua.Why is it laughable? You did not laugh at Tua being #1 overall. Mac Jones is the same as Tua. I don't see a reason why anyone who had Tua as #1 overall or top 5 pick should not have Jones in same category.
Better how? Because you say so? He was not better objectively to move the needle!Because Tua was better than Mac Jones. Jones is really good, but there was a reason why games were over at halftime with Tua.
No, that's your imagination. The differences do not move the needle!By every statistical measure, which by definition is objective.
Then I suppose he'll be the first QB taken by Jacksonville huh...No, that's you imagination. The differences do not move the needle!
TUA
9 games
Att: 252
Compl: 71.5%
TD: 33
INT: 3
SK: 10
Attempts per TD: 7.6
Attempts per INT: 84
Attempts per SK: 25.2
Attempts per game: 28
MAC
12 games
Att: 357
Compl: 77.0%
TD: 36
INT: 4
SK: 11
Attempts per TD: 9.9
Attempts per INT: 89
Attempts per SK: 32.5
Attempts per game: 29.8
That is facts!
You wanted Jacob Eason last year, gtfohWhy is it laughable? You did not laugh at Tua being #1 overall. Mac Jones is the same as Tua. I don't see a reason why anyone who had Tua as #1 overall or top 5 pick should not have Jones in same category.
another huge kid with a huge arm who can run...
If you ranked Tua as top 5 prospect, or wherever you ranked Tua last year, that is where you should have Mac Jones as well. Objectively.Then I suppose he'll be the first QB taken by Jacksonville huh...
No I did not.You wanted Jacob Eason last year, gtfoh
I mean, I don't and neither will anybody else but you. This should be a revelation to you, but you'll refuse to see it.If you ranked Tua as top 5 prospect, or wherever you ranked Tua last year, that is where you should have Mac Jones as well. Objectively.
I mean, I don't and neither will anybody else but you. This should be a revelation to you, but you'll refuse to see it.
Don’t ever changeI know. I will have Mac Jones (unless something happens in last game) as undraftable, just like I had Tua last year. Not interested in undersized quarterbacks coming from wacky college production.
But for the rest of you who value that, I do not see a reason Mac Jones is not top 5 prospect.
I like the way you party...Given the strengths and weakness on the unit side of this team. I can absolutely understand taking Sewell #3 or trade down and taking Smith/Chase. I cannot understand Parsons.
Another way of viewing Parsons, IMO, is to ask if he were already on this unit which of the following losses would he have helped us win?
1) Bills
2) Patriots
3) Seattle
4) Denver
5) KC
Now ask yourself the same question for say Sewell and especiall Smith/Chase?
Where would 1-2 extra wins have us now?