Did You See Matt Moore | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Did You See Matt Moore

Vaark said:
Actually I dunno why everyone but me it seems doesn't challenge this BS. IMO, clinching the playoffs should not have come down to being assaulted by Buffalo abetted by the 28-32nd best OL in a game that the week before Brady himself proved, he'd not have walked away from, and certainly not victorious. Considering that OL, no blocking TEs, one of the few red zone threats going down in TC and the other midseason, the 26th ranked running game, a rookie kicker who developed the yips, the internal and unnecessary disruptions created by a mommy's boy, and the 2nd coming of Dan Henning calling ponderous plays, IMO, Tannehill over-achieved in even getting them up to the 15 th game with the postseason in sight, beating 4 playoff bound teams. Although he certainly had his highs like NE and Pittsburgh and lows like game 17, It's not like he spent the whole season doing a Melty Ice playoff second half imitation.
Click to expand...

There is so much wrong in this entire paragraph that I will just tag it as absolutely Ridiculous..
 
People on here act like jerks. Why is it necessary to take a piss on Matt Moore in all this? So far MM has done nothing to inflame the controversy.

And to those who are mad because he didn't suck for luck - the guy has to play for his career not for a 1st pick. Get real and grow up.
 
Hey...it's was the game we needed to keep this thing rolling and give ourselves a chance to grow and progress hopefully.

It's does not definitively prove anything.....in two weeks we should start getting some players back and we will start finding out which way this things going to go.
 
Nublar7 said:
Matt Moore's handoffs are pure art and others only try to imitate. The way he ran the offense to those punts was by far the most exciting moments of this game. Who needs touchdowns when you have someone who has such a wonderful handoff talent?
Click to expand...

I agree, he put the ball where only the running back could get it.
 
jvw said:
If Moore has to come in and play this yr me thinks you will be one of those fans who roots against his success smh
Click to expand...

I'd wager there would be fewer fans upset than there were FH members today who were actively and silently rooting for Tannehill to tank.

2dum25y-2.jpg
 
67Stang said:
5 come back wins in just over 2 years....3 of those 5 wins against teams that made the playoffs. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/comeback.cgi?player=TannRy00

BTW Moore has 4 in his entire career and folded like a lawn chair in the 4th Quarter when he was a starter for us.
Click to expand...

so u did the research, and u saw that moore has 4 comebacks in his career ( 21 career starts) and tannehill has 5 ( 36 career starts) great argument u win.

ur right, i need to come over to ur side of the argument, y have i not seen ow well tannehill has played over his career as a fin, and u mention moore chokes in the 4th qtr, no one choked more than ryan tannehill did down the stretch last year in the final 2 games.

7 pts scored in 2 games vs inferior teams. is that choking or no?
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
so u did the research, and u saw that moore has 4 comebacks in his career ( 21 career starts) and tannehill has 5 ( 36 career starts) great argument u win.

ur right, i need to come over to ur side of the argument, y have i not seen ow well tannehill has played over his career as a fin, and u mention moore chokes in the 4th qtr, no one choked more than ryan tannehill did down the stretch last year in the final 2 games.

7 pts scored in 2 games vs inferior teams. is that choking or no?
Click to expand...

Matt Moore is not better than Tannehill Idk why it's even a debate. Like I've said before I like Moore as a backup but Tannehill offers so much more.
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
so u did the research, and u saw that moore has 4 comebacks in his career ( 21 career starts) and tannehill has 5 ( 36 career starts) great argument u win.

ur right, i need to come over to ur side of the argument, y have i not seen ow well tannehill has played over his career as a fin, and u mention moore chokes in the 4th qtr, no one choked more than ryan tannehill did down the stretch last year in the final 2 games.

7 pts scored in 2 games vs inferior teams. is that choking or no?
Click to expand...
Actually Matt Moore choked more in Buffalo last year than anyone. He had his chance to come in and prove something and failed miserably. There is a reason why he only has that many starts. Pretty obvious to most with any football IQ.
 
67Stang said:
Actually Matt Moore choked more in Buffalo last year than anyone. He had his chance to come in and prove something and failed miserably. There is a reason why he only has that many starts. Pretty obvious to most with any football IQ.
Click to expand...

wow dude, just wow, ive heard it all.

matt moore gets more blame for why we lost to the bills last year in buffalo than tannehill, even though it was tannehill who was the qb for 3 qtrs and we had a whopping 100 yds of total offense, and that may even be on the high side.

u r a funny dude, gotta admit it.

also, its funny how in ur mind that while tannehill is way better than moore, y r u holding tannehill to the same expectations as moore, shouldnt there be a lot more expected out of tannehill than moore, he is the ''franchise'' qb in the end, and moore is just a stinkin backup
 
If Moore is so ****ing good, why has he NEVER beaten out a starter? Not in Carolina and not here. Why aren't teams beating down our door for 'Moore'! There is a reason he's on the bench. The second game he starts the opposing D has the book on him, takes away what he likes and makes him a perennial backup all over again
 
The Buffalo game defines Matt Moore in a nutshell. He has a pretty pass for a good gain and then backs it up with a couple of pics and a fumble.
 
67Stang said:
The Buffalo game defines Matt Moore in a nutshell. He has a pretty pass for a good gain and then backs it up with a couple of pics and a fumble.
Click to expand...

dude, ur lost if u really r blaming the back up qb for a loss in buffalo, in which he threw 6 passes, compared to tannehills 27 attempts, that game.

u want to stand behind tannehill, go ahead, but if u r truly blaming the backup for that loss, there is no point on arguing.

not even the biggest tannehill supporters would blame moore for that game.

tannehill choked down the stretch last year, plain and simple.

for someone who is a ''franchise'' qb in your eyes, u hold him to pretty god damn low expectations.

can he do anything wrong in ur book?

i mean if he is excused from last years collapse, what is he to be blamed for
 
The only thing I noticed about Matt Moore was the pornstash thing going on. It got me thinking about how many girls he is going to plow tonight in celebration of a game well won. How you doin, baby? I am a NFL QB and I helped our team win tonight. What you doin for 15 minutes on our 9 hour flight back to Miami? On the football side of things, I was thankful that our backup, to the backup center, Nate Garner didn't hike the ball back to the endzone (like Oakland did) for an easy score. He did what he was supposed to do. Take care of the ball. We won. How is that a problem?
 
Matt Moore is given the opportunity to take the game winning knee more than any other backup QB in NFL history.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom