[video=youtube_share;nI6Q881c_RQ]https://youtu.be/nI6Q881c_RQ[/video]
We need a Tannehill sub-forum on this site like for real. As for what Kellerman said, he has a weird point. Miami has the worst QB situation in the league b/c with a "real-QB" they could be 10-6. Guys like Griffin III, Sanchez, Gabbert, Bradford, etc., don't count because even with "real-QBs" those teams wouldn't be good anyway.
So in a way he's saying Miami has good pieces but sucks b/c Tannehill is ****. So a hot chick with nice tits but a butterface really.
We need a Tannehill sub-forum on this site like for real. As for what Kellerman said, he has a weird point. Miami has the worst QB situation in the league b/c with a "real-QB" they could be 10-6. Guys like Griffin III, Sanchez, Gabbert, Bradford, etc., don't count because even with "real-QBs" those teams wouldn't be good anyway.
So in a way he's saying Miami has good pieces but sucks b/c Tannehill is ****. So a hot chick with nice tits but a butterface really.
the title is misleading, and I understand what Max and Stephen A smith are saying, but I think the question should be which team is depending more on their QB's this year. Because lets be real, if tannehill or Stafford cant improve then their teams will continue to struggle. They certainly aren't the worst but are they the biggest question marks whether or not they can win a playoff game this year? I would say yes because the Broncos won the damn superbowl without good QB play. the rest of the other guys like RG3 and the browns, no one is expecting much from that team this year.