Dolphins looking to trade 6 pick?

[3rdandinches]

If Pitts and Chase are gone then we're left with Smith/Waddle/Parsons/Sewell. I would make a trade with Denver in a heart beat even if it only got you a 2nd this year.

 

[The Ghost]

I'll admit it... I'm all over articles like this for a couple of reasons. One: I think we should have stayed at 12. and Two: I believe that it is ALWAYS better to trade down if you can get the right deal.

So...

Is this speculation real?

No clue.

But I hope so.

Trading down is almost always the best play. Smart GMs with big salaries on the line, know this. Impatient fans can’t see past the next pick.

 

[SCOTTY]

As much as some want to hate Griers moves...position 6 is one of power. That's why he traded back up. Moreso than wanting any particular player.

 

[SCOTTY]

That's what I heard too.

3 firsts, 3 seconds, 3 thirds... go get it Grier

 

[Manning]

Of course, if the 2 #1's were in 2022 and 2023. But even so, that's alot of draft spots to come up. I'd think Chicago would need to add more, to make it happen.

I personally think its going to be Denver and Miami will select a CB at #9. JMO.

Not unless we plan on trading X. We already have the 2 highest paid corners and drafted one in the first last yr. talk about an overkill.

 

[Manning]

Trade #6 to Wash for something that includes chase young

 

[Michael Scott]

If we trade out of the top 10 then I'll turn on this FO in a heartbeat. I don't care what the offer is. Tired of putting off to the future constantly.

I'm fine with moving down to 9 (Denver) if and only if Pitts AND Chase are off the board. Target Smith/Waddle there.

 

[deester11]

In a vacuum this makes plenty of sense. Gaining more 1's or perhaps 1 and 2's could allow you get a next tier player while being in perpetual player asset mode. As much as I want Pitts/Chase...if you gain Waddle and more picks...I think it's just as good to have a home run hitter and threat to score everytime as it is to have the aforementioned Chase/Pitts.

I'm waffling though..one day..it's this..then it's that. Draft please hurry.

 

[gregorygrant83]

If we trade out of the top 10 then I'll turn on this FO in a heartbeat. I don't care what the offer is. Tired of putting off to the future constantly.

I'm fine with moving down to 9 (Denver) if and only if Pitts AND Chase are off the board. Target Smith/Waddle there.

But if your intel was saying Smith or Waddle would be there at 11 you would rather trade to 9 to get them than to 11 just to avoid trading out of the top 10?

 

[mmikel30]

I wouldn’t trade past 10 I’d trade 6 for 10 a second in 2021 and a 3rd in 2021 or a second in 2022

 

[mrbunglez]

I say drop back with Denver and pick up Jeudy as well.

 

[Dolph N.Fan]

Pigs get fed
Hogs get slaughtered

Miami trades down again and they’ll probably screw themselves out of an elite player and probably have a bunch of Christian Wilkins instead, nice but not game changing.

 

[3rdandinches]

Trade back for a 2nd, use 18 and a 3rd to trade up and get two players you wanted and still be a head!

 

[Feverdream]

Trading down is almost always the best play. Smart GMs with big salaries on the line, know this. Impatient fans can’t see past the next pick.

The other day, someone posted an article that said just that... I wished I had saved the link.

 

[circumstances]

Before the Darnold trade I always said we might be in the catbird seat with Carolina and Denver if a QB falls.

Even after the trade, if I'm Carolina and I love Fields or Lance (for example), Darnold sure as hell isn't stopping me from selecting my QB of the future (I hardly gave the Jests jack-all for him anyway).

The rookie can sit behind Darnold and learn. Lance is super raw.

And Denver may come knocking too.

As another poster said, if Smith/Waddle/Parsons/Sewell are all still there at #6, we may end up in the catbird seat after all.

Or our #1 player in the entire draft is sitting there at #6, and we have some tough decisions to make.

It's good to be the king.