How far? I believe they're going to London this year
Coaching wins in football. Having a flexible and dominant defense also wins.
I honestly don't see Titans nor Colts better than Miami. Wentz has been mediocre for a few seasons. Their defense is strong, but not as good as ours verse the pass. They stop the run, and run it strong on offense. I do not fear them, nor their weenie coach.
Tennessee has lost a bunch of pieces. They did add some pieces, but over spent on Dupree, lost Smith and Davis on offense. Vrabel is a hard nosed guy,, but tends to over rely on ground game in the playoffs,, I don't know if he really is a top coach..
I see Miami being equal to or above those teams. I put Miami in divisional round, they are still too green and inexperienced for a real run this year in my opinion. They certainly have the coach to do it, but a lot remains to be seen. If we click and that offense starts humming, we will be a dangerous team. Miami humidity is an advantage in January, too bad we refused to capitalize on it for the past 3 decades
Also, if 10-6 didn't work last year to get i7to the 7 team playoffs, then there is certainly no way 10-7 is going to get 'er done. 10-7 is the new 9-7. We must win atleast 11 games. I think it's doable for sure, but in order to do so we must atleast go 4-2 in the division.
Thanks bro, I've missed it here. I was going through hell....but as the great Winston Churchill said, "if you're going through hell, keep going!" You're almost out!Good to see you posting Big C
The Tenn run game does level the playing field against most teams no doubt.
Cleveland is Cleveland to me, until they prove otherwise. Every time, for decades, as soon as it looks like they may have "turned the corner" everthing goes to hell.
I think both have peaked out, while we are on the ascent.
I ain't skeerd........
Tenn has Aj Brown and Julio. I mean that's a nasty duo and then the best rb in Henry. Cle has O'Dell and Landry which isn't bad but not much depth. The TE spot is solid and they have a top 3 run game. Baker and Tannehill though don't inspire much confidence in me. Neither does Tenn D.
This question is a tough one because we haven't seen Tua rise to expectations yet. So many "ifs" come into play when fans are predicting the future.... like the IF in my opening line (absent but implied).,,, looking at the schedule we could start out 0-2 and after the Ravens game we could be 5-5 with 7 games to play .....
IF we are 5- 5 by game 10 can we win 5 of 7 to get to 10-7? Does 10-7 get us in? It may, at that point, come down to tie breakers ....
I believe Tua is the wild card here. IF he plays to expectations we have a chance ... IF he doesn't we probably lose more than win ...
I think it's going to be tough to top last years win total unless Tua shows he is THE difference maker. IF he is the difference maker I see teams like the Pats, Saints Giants and Titans being closer to equal or less when compared to our Dolphins giving us a shot at a stronger record and a shot to win going forward into the playoffs.
I am not dogging Tua in my statements and I'm not trolling .... We have to have an answer at Qb before we can reasonably predict our future ...
Tannehill and Baker both inspire more confidence in me than Tua personally. I'm really hoping he makes the jump to that level but I'm very skeptical of his skill set.
Let's hope it doesn't come to that.Listen here, mister, this sort of objective, level-headed thinking doesnāt fly around here.
Spot on. Iām encouraged both by Tua and what Miami is doing to set him up to succeed so far this offseason. But he needs to produce better than last year. He doesnāt have to vault into āTop five QBā range, but he has to be top half of the pack, in my opinion. If he does that, I think Miami makes the playoffs.
If he doesnāt progress significantly by the end of the 2022 season, Miami has two first rounders to try again.
Quoting myself because of the laughing emoji given at this post.
Please explain why Tua is on their level when he's yet to put up even a good statistical season and Mayfield went 28/6 TD to INT and Tannehill 33/7
Obviously I don't expect those numbers from Tua his rookie year, but my evaluation of him was low coming out. He's done nothing yet to put himself on the level of either.
Might he this year? Yes, I hope he does. But if you're going to laugh at the fact both QB mentioned have already proven to be a tier above Tua you need to go watch some football and learn the game.
Not to be a complete tool, but you very literally compared Tua's numbers as a rookie to Mayfield's in his third year and Tannehill in his ninth...and then said you don't expect those numbers from Tua.
So why did you compare them?
I think the thing is that Tua's projection as an NFL QB prospect pre-injury was higher than Mayfield's, and certainly higher than Tannehill's. You can argue all you want about your view on his skillset, and I'm not going to denigrate your opinion, but the majority of scouts, prognosticators, etc. saw it that way.
We have a pretty clear idea of what Tannehill brings to the table. We've gotten a pretty good idea bout Mayfield, too...they both went through growing pains, specifically Mayfield's in 2019. I don't think Tua is at their level yet, but I certainly think he has it in him to have a better sophomore campaign than either of them did. And if THAT happens, I think Miami makes the playoffs. (For what it's worth, I think all three of the teams mentioned make it.)
KC, BUF, TEN, CLE, BAL, MIA, IND
His first paragraph may have missed the point, but your third paragraph is bizarre double talk.Your first paragraph misses the point entirely.
The point is that both QB have PROVEN to be on a higher level whereas anyone putting Tua on that level is projecting based on nothing.
The statistics were provided to show they DONT compare at this point, not to make a comparison.
Your first paragraph misses the point entirely.
The point is that both QB have PROVEN to be on a higher level whereas anyone putting Tua on that level is projecting based on nothing.
The statistics were provided to show they DONT compare at this point, not to make a comparison.