LOL@the worst QB in the league since JaMarcus, who was there when his team legitimately earned one playoff berth in his 4 seasons (as a passenger somewhere on the bus away from the driver's seat as Westhoff has declared) being even equivalent to RT17. No matter who he had to work with, or whatever excuse of the month is favored, the fact remains that even those scrubs got free many times without him noticing them while throwing into triple coverage. If he was doing that in his 4th year, then whatever he's done in the past was his ceiling; Tannehill's ceiling is certainly a penthouse or two higher than that, whether he achieves it or not.
Tannehill >> Buttboy > Genocide
I would have to agree with this assessment. The jury on whether Tannehill is a franchise qb or not is still out, but he is most certainly a better prospect than Sanchez or Geno. One can only hang his hat on those two AFCCG appearances for so long before he has to admit to Sanchez's flaws. Towards the end of his time as the Jets starter Mark Sanchez had trouble reading coverages. Tannehill on the other hand can read coverages pretty well, he just can't always get the ball placement right. Geno is a lost cause because he can't read coverages and on the rare times that he does read the defense correctly he misses the receiver by a country mile. I like Junc as a poster, but I am tired of reading about how two AFC Title Game Appearances validates Sanchez as a legit NFL franchise qb. That's like saying Brad Johnson is a better qb than Dan Marino because he has a ring. Team accomplishments don't always tell the story. All I have to do is believe what my eyes tell me which is: Tannehill, while having flaws in his game has more potential than Sanchez or Geno Smith ever have or will have.